SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.31012 of 2017   For Petitioner                         :  Mr.Ravi Shanmugam           For Respondents                        :  Mr.K.H.Ravikumar,                                                                  Government Advocate. O R D E R police order quashed and the third respondent is directed to reconsider and impose any other penalty other than the penalty of removal from service, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Further, the respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner in service without backwages but with continuity of service.          With the abovesaid directions, the writ petition stands allowed.  However, there shall be no order as to costs.               

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 20, 2022

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.31012 of 2017   For Petitioner                         :  Mr.Ravi Shanmugam           For Respondents                        :  Mr.K.H.Ravikumar,                                                                  Government Advocate. O R D E R police order quashed and the third respondent is directed to reconsider and impose any other penalty other than the penalty of removal from service, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Further, the respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner in service without backwages but with continuity of service.          With the abovesaid directions, the writ petition stands allowed.  However, there shall be no order as to costs.               

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 16-09-2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.31012 of 2017       A.Dharmendra                    ..                                        Petitioner   vs.    ...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.33967 of 2016   K.Ramachandran                                                                                        Petitioner                 writ allowed     CRPF police case                                  

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 19, 2022

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.33967 of 2016   K.Ramachandran                                                                                        Petitioner                 writ allowed     CRPF police case                                  

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED  :  19.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.33967 of 2016   K.Ramachandran                                                                                        Petitioner Vs.   1.The Union of India, Rep.by...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1571720811551260674?t=QRvJJlLIxFpOkfmMx2olAw&s=08 [9/19, 10:10] Sekarreporter1: Senior Advocate P Wilson requests Supreme Court to continue virtual hearings till regional benches are established

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 19, 2022

Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1571720811551260674?t=QRvJJlLIxFpOkfmMx2olAw&s=08 [9/19, 10:10] Sekarreporter1: Senior Advocate P Wilson requests Supreme Court to continue virtual hearings till regional benches are established

[9/19, 10:10] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1571720811551260674?t=QRvJJlLIxFpOkfmMx2olAw&s=08 [9/19, 10:10] Sekarreporter1: Senior Advocate P Wilson requests Supreme Court to continue virtual hearings till regional benches are established Rajya Sabha Member and senior lawyer P Wilson has long been...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Ashvath Neelakandan. V ‍chettinadu Law: On 17.09.2022 Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R. Suresh Kumar addressed the new batch of 2022-23 of Chettinad School of Law. He started his excellent address with the words, “Selecting the Legal profession is one of the clever decision that you have taken.” He commenced with the history of the courts and Law colleges in the south India of Madras Presidency. Then he elaborated his speech towards the identification of problems of a client as an art of advocacy is the essesntial requirement of an Advocate of this profession

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 19, 2022

Ashvath Neelakandan. V ‍chettinadu Law: On 17.09.2022 Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R. Suresh Kumar addressed the new batch of 2022-23 of Chettinad School of Law. He started his excellent address with the words, “Selecting the Legal profession is one of the clever decision that you have taken.” He commenced with the history of the courts and Law colleges in the south India of Madras Presidency. Then he elaborated his speech towards the identification of problems of a client as an art of advocacy is the essesntial requirement of an Advocate of this profession

[9/18, 22:32] Ashvath Neelakandan. V 👨🏻‍⚖️🤵🏻‍♂chettinadu Law: On 17.09.2022 Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R. Suresh Kumar addressed the new batch of 2022-23 of Chettinad School of Law. He started his excellent address with the words,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Thus, when all the circumstances above are taken cumulatively together, the findings of the Lower Appellate Court, that the complainant had not properly proved the loan transactions and the Trial Court has not properly appreciated about the capacity of the complainant, and the source of money, etc., cannot be held to be a perverse or an impossible view. Therefore, the Lower Appellate Court on the reading of the evidence and on exercising the jurisdiction has acquitted the accused. In these appeals against the acquittal, the said findings cannot be overturned as the finding of the guilt unless the findings are perverse or an impossible view. In that view of the matter, these appeals fail and are dismissed accordingly. 16.09.2022 judge barath sacravarthi

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 18, 2022

Thus, when all the circumstances above are taken cumulatively together, the findings of the Lower Appellate Court, that the complainant had not properly proved the loan transactions and the Trial Court has not properly appreciated about the capacity of the complainant, and the source of money, etc., cannot be held to be a perverse or an impossible view. Therefore, the Lower Appellate Court on the reading of the evidence and on exercising the jurisdiction has acquitted the accused. In these appeals against the acquittal, the said findings cannot be overturned as the finding of the guilt unless the findings are perverse or an impossible view. In that view of the matter, these appeals fail and are dismissed accordingly. 16.09.2022 judge barath sacravarthi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 22.08.2022 Pronounced on :  16.09.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.A.Nos.5, 6, 7 of 2021 In Crl.A.No.5 of 2021: C.Balu @...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Madras high court sep 17 orders whats app news

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 18, 2022

Madras high court sep 17 orders whats app news

[9/18, 07:02] Sekarreporter1: ஈ.பி.எஸ். தேர்வை அங்கீகரிக்கக்கூடாது – ஐகோர்ட்டில் வழக்கு அதிமுக இடைக்காலப் பொதுச் செயலாளராக எடப்பாடி பழனிசாமி தேர்ந்தெடுக்கப்பட்ட பொதுக்குழு தீர்மானங்களை அங்கீகரிக்க கூடாது….. திண்டுக்கல்லை சேர்ந்த அதிமுக உறுப்பினர் சூரியமூர்த்தி என்பவர் சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் மனுத்தாக்கல் அதிமுக-வில் நிறுவனர் எம்.ஜி.ஆர்., பொதுச்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version