SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Re-opening of TRAN Forms to claim Transitional ITC Background: The Hon‟ble Supreme Court of India vide order dated 22.07.2022 in the matter of Union of India vs. M/s. Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd., SLP(C) No. 32709-32710/2018 have allowed the aggrieved taxpayers to file Form TRAN-1/TRAN-2 to claim the transitional Input Tax Credit (ITC). In

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 2, 2022

Re-opening of TRAN Forms to claim Transitional ITC Background: The Hon‟ble Supreme Court of India vide order dated 22.07.2022 in the matter of Union of India vs. M/s. Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd., SLP(C) No. 32709-32710/2018 have allowed the aggrieved taxpayers to file Form TRAN-1/TRAN-2 to claim the transitional Input Tax Credit (ITC). In

Re-opening of TRAN Forms to claim Transitional ITC Background: The Hon‟ble Supreme Court of India vide order dated 22.07.2022 in the matter of Union of India vs. M/s. Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd., SLP(C)...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
நீதிபதி சுரேஷ்குமார், படிப்பை முடித்ததிலிருந்து 2 ஆண்டுகள் பணியாற்ற வேண்டும் என ஒப்பந்தம் போடப்படட்டு உள்ளதால் அந்த கால அவகாசம் முடிந்த பின்,mbbs docters சான்றிதழ்களை பெற மனுதாரர்களுக்கு உரிமையுண்டு என தெரிவித்துள்ளார்.

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 2, 2022

நீதிபதி சுரேஷ்குமார், படிப்பை முடித்ததிலிருந்து 2 ஆண்டுகள் பணியாற்ற வேண்டும் என ஒப்பந்தம் போடப்படட்டு உள்ளதால் அந்த கால அவகாசம் முடிந்த பின்,mbbs docters சான்றிதழ்களை பெற மனுதாரர்களுக்கு உரிமையுண்டு என தெரிவித்துள்ளார்.

மருத்துவ மேற்படிப்பை முடித்த இரண்டு ஆண்டுகளில் அரசு மருத்துவமனையில் பணியாற்ற வாய்ப்பு அளிக்கப்படாதவர்களுக்கு, அவர்களின் உண்மை சான்றிதழ்களை திரும்ப வழங்க வேண்டுமென தமிழக அரசுக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. அரசு மருத்துவ கல்லூரிகளில் மருத்துவ மேற்படிப்புகளில் சேர்பவர்கள் இரு ஆண்டுகளுக்கு அரசு மருத்துவமனைகளில் பணிபுரிய வேண்டும்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Docters pg course case full order of. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P. No.26472 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.25535 of 2022 and For Petitioners         : Mr.E.Manoharan   [in WP.No.26472/2022] : Mr.R.Arumugam   [inWP.Nos.19196 & 24016/2022] : Mr.Suhrith Parthasarathy  [in W.P.Nos.21219, 25282, 21907 &   25759/2022] : Mr. K.Thilageswaran   [in WP.No.21682/2022] : Mr.Sharath Chandran   [in WP.Nos.25592, 25595, 25599,   25246, 25248, 25257 & 25258/2022]                                  For Respondents       : Mrs.Stalin Abhimanyu             Additional Government Pleader   COMMON   O R D E R

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 2, 2022

Docters pg course case full order of. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P. No.26472 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.25535 of 2022 and For Petitioners         : Mr.E.Manoharan   [in WP.No.26472/2022] : Mr.R.Arumugam   [inWP.Nos.19196 & 24016/2022] : Mr.Suhrith Parthasarathy  [in W.P.Nos.21219, 25282, 21907 &   25759/2022] : Mr. K.Thilageswaran   [in WP.No.21682/2022] : Mr.Sharath Chandran   [in WP.Nos.25592, 25595, 25599,   25246, 25248, 25257 & 25258/2022]                                  For Respondents       : Mrs.Stalin Abhimanyu             Additional Government Pleader   COMMON   O R D E R

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED  : 29.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P. No.26472 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.25535 of 2022 and W.P.Nos.19196 & 24016 of 2022 and W.P.No.21219 of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Fir against former minister quashed full order. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL.O.P.Nos.17212, 20904 & 17871 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.Nos.10422, 13683 & 11442 of 2022. For Petitioner           : Mr.A.Natarajan, Senior Counsel for Ms.A.Madhumathi     For Respondents For R1      : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor For R2                      : Mr.P.Anandan for M/S.Majestic Law Firm Crl.O.P.No.20904 of 2022 N.Jayapriya      … Petitioner

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 1, 2022

Fir against former minister quashed full order. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL.O.P.Nos.17212, 20904 & 17871 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.Nos.10422, 13683 & 11442 of 2022. For Petitioner           : Mr.A.Natarajan, Senior Counsel for Ms.A.Madhumathi     For Respondents For R1      : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor For R2                      : Mr.P.Anandan for M/S.Majestic Law Firm Crl.O.P.No.20904 of 2022 N.Jayapriya      … Petitioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON :  13.09.2022 PRONOUNCED ON :          .09.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN   CRL.O.P.Nos.17212, 20904 & 17871 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.Nos.10422, 13683 & 11442 of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
ITEM NO.28               COURT NO.7               SECTION XII                S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)  Nos.15705-15706/2022 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated  02-09-2022 in OSA No. 231/2022 and OSA No. 232/2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras) P. VAIRAMUTHU (A) AMMAN P. VAIRAMUTHU              Petitioner(s)                                 VERSUS THIRU K. PALANISWAMY & ORS.                        Respondent(s). Full order no stay mentioned in the order mhc adv inbadurai stated

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 1, 2022

ITEM NO.28               COURT NO.7               SECTION XII                S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)  Nos.15705-15706/2022 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated  02-09-2022 in OSA No. 231/2022 and OSA No. 232/2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras) P. VAIRAMUTHU (A) AMMAN P. VAIRAMUTHU              Petitioner(s)                                 VERSUS THIRU K. PALANISWAMY & ORS.                        Respondent(s). Full order no stay mentioned in the order mhc adv inbadurai stated

ITEM NO.28               COURT NO.7               SECTION XII S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
The contempt petitioners were represented by Senior Counsel Mr S Prabakaran,Mr G Rajagopalan and Mr N l Rajah and the State were represented by Senior Counsel Mr NR Elango and State PP Jinnah. The learner Senior Counsel Mr S Prabakaran vehemently contended that in spite of the positive direction given by this Hon’ble

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 1, 2022

The contempt petitioners were represented by Senior Counsel Mr S Prabakaran,Mr G Rajagopalan and Mr N l Rajah and the State were represented by Senior Counsel Mr NR Elango and State PP Jinnah. The learner Senior Counsel Mr S Prabakaran vehemently contended that in spite of the positive direction given by this Hon’ble

[10/1, 08:56] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1575784594317901824?t=nnWJqbxteUx9itD7e8Nemg&s=08 [10/1, 08:56] Sekarreporter1: On Friday the Hon’ble madras High court heard the batch of Contempt petitions filed by the RSS against the home secretary for rejection of their representations inspite...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Sekarreporter whatsapp update last week round up news

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 1, 2022

Sekarreporter whatsapp update last week round up news

[9/22, 19:01] Sekarreporter1: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.Nos.3408 and 3410 of 2019 & W.M.P.No.3691 & 3692 of 2019 M/s.Surya Sri Constructions. For Petitioner     : Mr.C.Baktha Siromoni                                     For Respondent  :...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version