SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Therefore the students should be allowed to write examinations only after completing 10 months of the course. Therefore, the University is advised to formulate a system that the students are completing at least 10 months course and thereafter attempt to write the examinations. Further the University is advised to issue certificate clarifying the during of course while issuing the course completion certificate. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands allowed. THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY (MD)No.17633 of 2017and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.14185 to 14187 of 2017 M.Senbagam                              …  Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Teacher Recruitment Board, . For Petitioner           : Mr.V.Panneer Selvam For Respondents    : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan (for R1)    Mr.V.OMprakash (for R2 & R3)    Government Advocate (Civil Side)    Mr.K.Ragatheeshkumar (for R4)    for M/S.Isaac Chamber   ORDER

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 6, 2022

Therefore the students should be allowed to write examinations only after completing 10 months of the course. Therefore, the University is advised to formulate a system that the students are completing at least 10 months course and thereafter attempt to write the examinations. Further the University is advised to issue certificate clarifying the during of course while issuing the course completion certificate. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands allowed. THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY (MD)No.17633 of 2017and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.14185 to 14187 of 2017 M.Senbagam                              …  Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Teacher Recruitment Board, . For Petitioner           : Mr.V.Panneer Selvam For Respondents    : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan (for R1)    Mr.V.OMprakash (for R2 & R3)    Government Advocate (Civil Side)    Mr.K.Ragatheeshkumar (for R4)    for M/S.Isaac Chamber   ORDER

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT        DATED:16.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY (MD)No.17633 of 2017and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.14185 to 14187 of 2017 M.Senbagam                              …  Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Teacher Recruitment Board, Rep. by...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Sekarreporter1: A difference of opinion has occurred in the powerful Supreme Court collegium over the correct procedure to recommend four names, one of them a senior advocate, to the apex court Bench after months of presenting a unified front which saw many firsts in judicial appointments to the constitutional courts.

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 6, 2022

Sekarreporter1: A difference of opinion has occurred in the powerful Supreme Court collegium over the correct procedure to recommend four names, one of them a senior advocate, to the apex court Bench after months of presenting a unified front which saw many firsts in judicial appointments to the constitutional courts.

[10/6, 07:01] Sekarreporter1: A difference of opinion has occurred in the powerful Supreme Court collegium over the correct procedure to recommend four names, one of them a senior advocate, to the apex court Bench...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
the upshot of the above discussions, the Writ Petition has to be necessarily allowed and the excess fee and the stamp duty collected will have to be refunded by the respondents. The Writ Petition stands allowed, a Writ of Mandamus will issue directing the respondents to refund the excess stamp duty and registration fee to the tune of Rs.19,72,620/- with interest at 9% per annum from the date of filing of this Writ Petition till date of payment.  There shall be no order as to costs. 12.09.2022 THE HONOURABLE  MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN W.P.No.23237 of 2018 Bell Tower Enterprises LLP, For Petitioner           : Mr. Sharath Chandran    for Mr. Govind Chandrasekhar                        For Respondents      : Mrs. V.Yamunadevi    Special Government Pleader  O R D E R

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 6, 2022

the upshot of the above discussions, the Writ Petition has to be necessarily allowed and the excess fee and the stamp duty collected will have to be refunded by the respondents. The Writ Petition stands allowed, a Writ of Mandamus will issue directing the respondents to refund the excess stamp duty and registration fee to the tune of Rs.19,72,620/- with interest at 9% per annum from the date of filing of this Writ Petition till date of payment.  There shall be no order as to costs. 12.09.2022 THE HONOURABLE  MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN W.P.No.23237 of 2018 Bell Tower Enterprises LLP, For Petitioner           : Mr. Sharath Chandran    for Mr. Govind Chandrasekhar                        For Respondents      : Mrs. V.Yamunadevi    Special Government Pleader  O R D E R

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on 26.08.2022 Delivered on     12.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE  MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN W.P.No.23237 of 2018 Bell Tower Enterprises LLP, Rep. by its Managing Partner, P.Anand, 87/42-A3, Maruthi...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[10/5, 22:02] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1577698240128225283?t=vVn2GIPXcyTu5jvSoB1LQg&s=08 [10/5, 22:03] Sekarreporter1: Supreme Court acquits the accused facing death penalty conviction for rape and murder of a minor girl. Full order of. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs.361­362 OF 2018 CHOTKAU                                                                       …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH                                                                      …RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 5, 2022

[10/5, 22:02] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1577698240128225283?t=vVn2GIPXcyTu5jvSoB1LQg&s=08 [10/5, 22:03] Sekarreporter1: Supreme Court acquits the accused facing death penalty conviction for rape and murder of a minor girl. Full order of. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs.361­362 OF 2018 CHOTKAU                                                                       …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH                                                                      …RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs.361­362 OF 2018 CHOTKAU                                                                       …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH                                                                      …RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Removal of. encroachments    S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil)  No(s).  4677/1985 M.C.MEHTA                                          Petitioner(s)                                 VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                              Respondent(s) (MATTER IS LISTED ONLY FOR DIRECTIONS ONLY NAMES OF FOLLOWING ADVOCATES MAY BE TREATED TO HAVE BEEN SHOWN IN THE LIST :MR. S GURU KRISHNA KUMAR, SR. ADVOCATE (A.C.) MS. ANITHA SHENOY, SR. ADVOCATE (A.C.)MR. A.D.N. RAO, SR. ADVOCATE (A.C.)PETITIONER-IN-PERSON MR. G.S. MAKKER,MR. AMRISH KUMAR,MR. PRAVEEN SWARUP, MR. NISHIT AGRAWAL,MR. CHIRAG M. SHROFF, ADVOCATES )  Date : 30-09-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM :          HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL          HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA Mr. S. Guru Krishna Kumar, Sr. Adv. (A.C.) Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. (A.C.) Ms. Aarti

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 5, 2022

Removal of. encroachments    S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil)  No(s).  4677/1985 M.C.MEHTA                                          Petitioner(s)                                 VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                              Respondent(s) (MATTER IS LISTED ONLY FOR DIRECTIONS ONLY NAMES OF FOLLOWING ADVOCATES MAY BE TREATED TO HAVE BEEN SHOWN IN THE LIST :MR. S GURU KRISHNA KUMAR, SR. ADVOCATE (A.C.) MS. ANITHA SHENOY, SR. ADVOCATE (A.C.)MR. A.D.N. RAO, SR. ADVOCATE (A.C.)PETITIONER-IN-PERSON MR. G.S. MAKKER,MR. AMRISH KUMAR,MR. PRAVEEN SWARUP, MR. NISHIT AGRAWAL,MR. CHIRAG M. SHROFF, ADVOCATES )  Date : 30-09-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM :          HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL          HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA Mr. S. Guru Krishna Kumar, Sr. Adv. (A.C.) Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. (A.C.) Ms. Aarti

ITEM NO.42               COURT NO.3               SECTION PIL-W S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil)  No(s).  4677/1985 M.C.MEHTA                                          Petitioner(s)...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
The Court while invoking the principles of Karma granted relief to the Petitioner-cop. “In the principles of Karma the “Sanchita Karma” (entire karma) is apportioned as “Prarabdha Karma” (portion of the karma) and punishment is imposed to undergo only for the “Prarabdha Karma” (portion of the karma).”, the bench of Justice S. Srimathy observed. – full order THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY (MD).No.19529 of 2022and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.14256 and 14257 of 2022 R.Srimurugan                                                                              …  Petitioner

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 5, 2022

The Court while invoking the principles of Karma granted relief to the Petitioner-cop. “In the principles of Karma the “Sanchita Karma” (entire karma) is apportioned as “Prarabdha Karma” (portion of the karma) and punishment is imposed to undergo only for the “Prarabdha Karma” (portion of the karma).”, the bench of Justice S. Srimathy observed. – full order THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY (MD).No.19529 of 2022and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.14256 and 14257 of 2022 R.Srimurugan                                                                              …  Petitioner

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT  RESERVED ON  :  14.09.2022                                        DELIVERED ON  :  27.09.2022   CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY (MD).No.19529 of 2022and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.14256 and 14257 of 2022 R.Srimurugan                                                                             ...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version