SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Draft Inputs for State Education Policy. State Commission for Education In order to continuously monitor and implement the multiple programmes at various layers, upgrade, update and review them, the Tamil Nadu State Commission for Education can be statutorily constituted, which can continue despite the change of the Government at any point of time.           Given to D Murugesan judge by cathalic kalagam  

Uncategorized

Draft Inputs for State Education Policy. State Commission for Education In order to continuously monitor and implement the multiple programmes at various layers, upgrade, update and review them, the Tamil Nadu State Commission for Education can be statutorily constituted, which can continue despite the change of the Government at any point of time.           Given to D Murugesan judge by cathalic kalagam  

Draft Inputs for State Education Policy Index No. Content P.No.   General Introduction 3   1. School Education 1.1. Introduction 6 1.2. Guiding Principles 7 1.3. Policy Proposals 1.3.1. Access 8 1.3.2. Inclusion 9...

Therefore the students should be allowed to write examinations only after completing 10 months of the course. Therefore, the University is advised to formulate a system that the students are completing at least 10 months course and thereafter attempt to write the examinations. Further the University is advised to issue certificate clarifying the during of course while issuing the course completion certificate. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands allowed. THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY (MD)No.17633 of 2017and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.14185 to 14187 of 2017 M.Senbagam                              …  Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Teacher Recruitment Board, . For Petitioner           : Mr.V.Panneer Selvam For Respondents    : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan (for R1)    Mr.V.OMprakash (for R2 & R3)    Government Advocate (Civil Side)    Mr.K.Ragatheeshkumar (for R4)    for M/S.Isaac Chamber   ORDER

Uncategorized

Therefore the students should be allowed to write examinations only after completing 10 months of the course. Therefore, the University is advised to formulate a system that the students are completing at least 10 months course and thereafter attempt to write the examinations. Further the University is advised to issue certificate clarifying the during of course while issuing the course completion certificate. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands allowed. THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY (MD)No.17633 of 2017and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.14185 to 14187 of 2017 M.Senbagam                              …  Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Teacher Recruitment Board, . For Petitioner           : Mr.V.Panneer Selvam For Respondents    : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan (for R1)    Mr.V.OMprakash (for R2 & R3)    Government Advocate (Civil Side)    Mr.K.Ragatheeshkumar (for R4)    for M/S.Isaac Chamber   ORDER

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT        DATED:16.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY (MD)No.17633 of 2017and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.14185 to 14187 of 2017 M.Senbagam                              …  Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Teacher Recruitment Board, Rep. by...

Sekarreporter1: A difference of opinion has occurred in the powerful Supreme Court collegium over the correct procedure to recommend four names, one of them a senior advocate, to the apex court Bench after months of presenting a unified front which saw many firsts in judicial appointments to the constitutional courts.

Uncategorized

Sekarreporter1: A difference of opinion has occurred in the powerful Supreme Court collegium over the correct procedure to recommend four names, one of them a senior advocate, to the apex court Bench after months of presenting a unified front which saw many firsts in judicial appointments to the constitutional courts.

[10/6, 07:01] Sekarreporter1: A difference of opinion has occurred in the powerful Supreme Court collegium over the correct procedure to recommend four names, one of them a senior advocate, to the apex court Bench...

the upshot of the above discussions, the Writ Petition has to be necessarily allowed and the excess fee and the stamp duty collected will have to be refunded by the respondents. The Writ Petition stands allowed, a Writ of Mandamus will issue directing the respondents to refund the excess stamp duty and registration fee to the tune of Rs.19,72,620/- with interest at 9% per annum from the date of filing of this Writ Petition till date of payment.  There shall be no order as to costs. 12.09.2022 THE HONOURABLE  MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN W.P.No.23237 of 2018 Bell Tower Enterprises LLP, For Petitioner           : Mr. Sharath Chandran    for Mr. Govind Chandrasekhar                        For Respondents      : Mrs. V.Yamunadevi    Special Government Pleader  O R D E R

Uncategorized

the upshot of the above discussions, the Writ Petition has to be necessarily allowed and the excess fee and the stamp duty collected will have to be refunded by the respondents. The Writ Petition stands allowed, a Writ of Mandamus will issue directing the respondents to refund the excess stamp duty and registration fee to the tune of Rs.19,72,620/- with interest at 9% per annum from the date of filing of this Writ Petition till date of payment.  There shall be no order as to costs. 12.09.2022 THE HONOURABLE  MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN W.P.No.23237 of 2018 Bell Tower Enterprises LLP, For Petitioner           : Mr. Sharath Chandran    for Mr. Govind Chandrasekhar                        For Respondents      : Mrs. V.Yamunadevi    Special Government Pleader  O R D E R

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on 26.08.2022 Delivered on     12.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE  MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN W.P.No.23237 of 2018 Bell Tower Enterprises LLP, Rep. by its Managing Partner, P.Anand, 87/42-A3, Maruthi...

[10/5, 22:02] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1577698240128225283?t=vVn2GIPXcyTu5jvSoB1LQg&s=08 [10/5, 22:03] Sekarreporter1: Supreme Court acquits the accused facing death penalty conviction for rape and murder of a minor girl. Full order of. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs.361­362 OF 2018 CHOTKAU                                                                       …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH                                                                      …RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.

Uncategorized

[10/5, 22:02] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1577698240128225283?t=vVn2GIPXcyTu5jvSoB1LQg&s=08 [10/5, 22:03] Sekarreporter1: Supreme Court acquits the accused facing death penalty conviction for rape and murder of a minor girl. Full order of. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs.361­362 OF 2018 CHOTKAU                                                                       …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH                                                                      …RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs.361­362 OF 2018 CHOTKAU                                                                       …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH                                                                      …RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com