SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

பொறுப்பு தலைமை நீதிபதி ராஜா மற்றும் நீதிபதி கிருஷ்ணகுமார் அமர்வு, மனுவுக்கு நான்கு வாரங்களில் பதிலளிக்கும்படி தமிழக அரசுக்கு உத்தரவிட்டு, விசார்ணையை தள்ளிவைத்தது.

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 11, 2022

பொறுப்பு தலைமை நீதிபதி ராஜா மற்றும் நீதிபதி கிருஷ்ணகுமார் அமர்வு, மனுவுக்கு நான்கு வாரங்களில் பதிலளிக்கும்படி தமிழக அரசுக்கு உத்தரவிட்டு, விசார்ணையை தள்ளிவைத்தது.

  கிறிஸ்தவ வன்னியர்களை மிகவும் பிற்படுத்தப்பட்ட வகுப்பில் சேர்க்க கோரிய மனுவுக்கு பதிலளிக்கும்படி தமிழக அரசுக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. பொள்ளாச்சியைச் சேர்ந்த கால்நடை மருத்துவர் விஜயன் தாக்கல் செய்த பொது நல மனுவில், கிறிஸ்தவ வன்னியர்களை மிகவும் பிற்படுத்தப்பட்ட வகுப்பில் சேர்த்து 1993 ம்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
JUDGMENT SUMMARY IN S.A. No. 602/2020 ADVOCATE SHARADA VIVEK (Appointed by the Legal Services Authority) ஆகா, இப்படி ஒரு பிள்ளையைப் பெறுவதற்கு பெற்றோர்கள் என்ன தவம் செய்திருக்க வேண்டும்என்று உலகத்தவர் மெச்சும்படி ஒரு பிள்ளை இருக்க வேண்டும் என்று , வள்ளுவரை மேற்கோள்காட்டி உயர்நீதிமன்ற நீதியரசர் பி டி ஆஷா அவர்கள் உலக குழந்தைகளுக்கு கலங்கரை விளக்கமாக ஒரு தீர்ப்பு சொல்லி இருக்கிறார்கள் .

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 10, 2022

JUDGMENT SUMMARY IN S.A. No. 602/2020 ADVOCATE SHARADA VIVEK (Appointed by the Legal Services Authority) ஆகா, இப்படி ஒரு பிள்ளையைப் பெறுவதற்கு பெற்றோர்கள் என்ன தவம் செய்திருக்க வேண்டும்என்று உலகத்தவர் மெச்சும்படி ஒரு பிள்ளை இருக்க வேண்டும் என்று , வள்ளுவரை மேற்கோள்காட்டி உயர்நீதிமன்ற நீதியரசர் பி டி ஆஷா அவர்கள் உலக குழந்தைகளுக்கு கலங்கரை விளக்கமாக ஒரு தீர்ப்பு சொல்லி இருக்கிறார்கள் .

[10/9, 17:07] Sekarreporter 1: JUDGMENT SUMMARY IN S.A. No. 602/2020 ADVOCATE SHARADA VIVEK (Appointed by the Legal Services Authority) ஆகா, இப்படி ஒரு பிள்ளையைப் பெறுவதற்கு பெற்றோர்கள் என்ன தவம் செய்திருக்க வேண்டும்என்று உலகத்தவர் மெச்சும்படி ஒரு பிள்ளை இருக்க...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1579074244071522306?t=rLy2GKKzMoHMWrjlw7x_Hg&s=08 [10/9, 17:12] Sekarreporter 1: JUDGMENT SUMMARY IN S.A. No. 602 of 2020 ADVOCATE SHARADA VIVEK (Appointed by the Legal Services Authority) ‘I love the little boy you are now and the man you will become.’ This is the love of the parents for their son in the case in hand. The loving parents were put to shock when the son forbade them at their time of utmost necessity.

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 10, 2022

Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1579074244071522306?t=rLy2GKKzMoHMWrjlw7x_Hg&s=08 [10/9, 17:12] Sekarreporter 1: JUDGMENT SUMMARY IN S.A. No. 602 of 2020 ADVOCATE SHARADA VIVEK (Appointed by the Legal Services Authority) ‘I love the little boy you are now and the man you will become.’ This is the love of the parents for their son in the case in hand. The loving parents were put to shock when the son forbade them at their time of utmost necessity.

[10/9, 17:12] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1579074244071522306?t=rLy2GKKzMoHMWrjlw7x_Hg&s=08 [10/9, 17:12] Sekarreporter 1: JUDGMENT SUMMARY IN S.A. No. 602 of 2020 ADVOCATE SHARADA VIVEK (Appointed by the Legal Services Authority) ‘I love the little boy you are now...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Advocate B. Jagannath of the Madras High Court had filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking a Relief for the Tamilnadu Police to Create an Anti Terrorist Squad – Quick Reaction response unit for which he had given representation in May 2022  Advocate General Shanmugasundaram had appeared for State Government and Public Prosecutor Mohammed Ali Jinnah had appeared for DGP and ADGP Coastal Police

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 10, 2022

Advocate B. Jagannath of the Madras High Court had filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking a Relief for the Tamilnadu Police to Create an Anti Terrorist Squad – Quick Reaction response unit for which he had given representation in May 2022  Advocate General Shanmugasundaram had appeared for State Government and Public Prosecutor Mohammed Ali Jinnah had appeared for DGP and ADGP Coastal Police

: Advocate B. Jagannath of the Madras High Court had filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking a Relief for the Tamilnadu Police to Create an Anti Terrorist Squad – Quick Reaction response unit for...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
In the result, this Court does not find any ground to interfere with the Award passed by the Arbitrator and as confirmed by the District Court under Section 34 of the Act and accordingly, this Appeal stands dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs.                                                                          [J.N.B., J.]      [N.A.V., J.]                                                                                                10.10.2022. THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH C.M.A.(MD)No.834 of 2011  

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 10, 2022

In the result, this Court does not find any ground to interfere with the Award passed by the Arbitrator and as confirmed by the District Court under Section 34 of the Act and accordingly, this Appeal stands dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs.                                                                          [J.N.B., J.]      [N.A.V., J.]                                                                                                10.10.2022. THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH C.M.A.(MD)No.834 of 2011  

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT   RESERVED ON    :   29.09.2022 DELIVERED ON   :   10.10.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH   C.M.A.(MD)No.834 of 2011...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[10/10, 12:47] Adv Riyaz: Section 119 of Indian Evidence Act:- Dumb witnesses How to examine such witnesses; Mandatory requirements; Guidelines and principles laid down by His Lordship Hon’ble Mr Justice Sunder Mohan in Ravichandran Vs State Crl.A.No.65 of 2020 dated 22.09.22 •Meaning of “unable to communicate verbally” in proviso to section 119 of IEA •Effect of non following the mandate of section 119 IEA •Principles @ para 16 of the judgment [10/10, 12:50] Sekarreporter 1: 👍

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 10, 2022

[10/10, 12:47] Adv Riyaz: Section 119 of Indian Evidence Act:- Dumb witnesses How to examine such witnesses; Mandatory requirements; Guidelines and principles laid down by His Lordship Hon’ble Mr Justice Sunder Mohan in Ravichandran Vs State Crl.A.No.65 of 2020 dated 22.09.22 •Meaning of “unable to communicate verbally” in proviso to section 119 of IEA •Effect of non following the mandate of section 119 IEA •Principles @ para 16 of the judgment [10/10, 12:50] Sekarreporter 1: 👍

[10/10, 12:47] Adv Riyaz: Section 119 of Indian Evidence Act:- Dumb witnesses How to examine such witnesses; Mandatory requirements; Guidelines and principles laid down by His Lordship Hon’ble Mr Justice Sunder Mohan in Ravichandran...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Sc collegium urgent letter In the circumstances, no further steps need be taken and the unfinished work in the meeting called for September 30, 2022 is closed without there being any further deliberation.  The meeting dated September 30, 2022 stands discharged. ……………………………….CJI. (Uday Umesh Lalit)  ………………………………….J. (Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud) ………………………………….J. (Sanjay Kishan Kaul) .………………………………….J. (S. Abdul Nazeer) .………………………………….J. (K.M. Joseph) New Delhi; October 9, 2022. RESOLUTION  For filling up vacancies of Judges in the Supreme Court, informal deliberations had been going on for some time and a formal meeting took place on September 26, 2022 when the names of eleven Judges were considered.  As there was unanimity of opinion on the name of Mr. Justice Dipankar Dutta, Chief Justice, High Court of Bombay, a Resolution to that effect was passed and the consideration of the names of other ten Judges was deferred till September 30, 2022.

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 10, 2022

Sc collegium urgent letter In the circumstances, no further steps need be taken and the unfinished work in the meeting called for September 30, 2022 is closed without there being any further deliberation.  The meeting dated September 30, 2022 stands discharged. ……………………………….CJI. (Uday Umesh Lalit)  ………………………………….J. (Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud) ………………………………….J. (Sanjay Kishan Kaul) .………………………………….J. (S. Abdul Nazeer) .………………………………….J. (K.M. Joseph) New Delhi; October 9, 2022. RESOLUTION  For filling up vacancies of Judges in the Supreme Court, informal deliberations had been going on for some time and a formal meeting took place on September 26, 2022 when the names of eleven Judges were considered.  As there was unanimity of opinion on the name of Mr. Justice Dipankar Dutta, Chief Justice, High Court of Bombay, a Resolution to that effect was passed and the consideration of the names of other ten Judges was deferred till September 30, 2022.

  RESOLUTION   For filling up vacancies of Judges in the Supreme Court, informal deliberations had been going on for some time and a formal meeting took place on September 26, 2022 when the...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version