SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.21974 of 2017 and. For Petitioner               : Mr.G.Rajagopalan                                                     Senior Counsel                                                     For M/s.Bader Sayeed                 For R1 to R3           : Mrs.S.Mythreyechandru                                                     Special Government Pleader                                                                   For R4                              : No appearance ORDER. In view of the facts and circumstances, it is established that the appointment of the writ petitioner is not in accordance with the rules applicable in the State of Tamil Nadu for appointment to the post of P.G. Assistant. Thus, the petitioner is not entitled for the relief as this Court do not find any infirmity in respect of the order passed by the respondents.           Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 12, 2022

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.21974 of 2017 and. For Petitioner               : Mr.G.Rajagopalan                                                     Senior Counsel                                                     For M/s.Bader Sayeed                 For R1 to R3           : Mrs.S.Mythreyechandru                                                     Special Government Pleader                                                                   For R4                              : No appearance ORDER. In view of the facts and circumstances, it is established that the appointment of the writ petitioner is not in accordance with the rules applicable in the State of Tamil Nadu for appointment to the post of P.G. Assistant. Thus, the petitioner is not entitled for the relief as this Court do not find any infirmity in respect of the order passed by the respondents.           Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED  : 28.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.21974 of 2017 and W.M.P.Nos.23025 & 23026 of 2017   G.Heera Khatoon                                                                              …Petitioner Vs.  ...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.7724 of 2014 and. For Petitioner               : Mrs.AL.Ganthimathi                 For R1                              : Mr.V.Govardhanan                                                     For M/s.Row and Reddy                           For R2                              : Mr.B.Harish                                                     For M/s.K.M.Vijayan Associates                 For R3                              : Mr.D.Muthukumar                 For R4                              : No appearance        ORDER.this Court is of the considered opinion that the appointment of the respondents 3 and 4 are illegal and in violation of the Government orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.72, Higher Education (K2) Department dated 30.04.2013 as both of them are not possessing requisite educational qualifications as per the notification issued for recruitment to the post of Assistant Professor (Zoology), more

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 12, 2022

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.7724 of 2014 and. For Petitioner               : Mrs.AL.Ganthimathi                 For R1                              : Mr.V.Govardhanan                                                     For M/s.Row and Reddy                           For R2                              : Mr.B.Harish                                                     For M/s.K.M.Vijayan Associates                 For R3                              : Mr.D.Muthukumar                 For R4                              : No appearance        ORDER.this Court is of the considered opinion that the appointment of the respondents 3 and 4 are illegal and in violation of the Government orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.72, Higher Education (K2) Department dated 30.04.2013 as both of them are not possessing requisite educational qualifications as per the notification issued for recruitment to the post of Assistant Professor (Zoology), more

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED  : 30.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.7724 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 and W.M.P.No.3475 of 2016   Dr.S.Sandilyan                                                                              …Petitioner Vs....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
The paper publication regarding the above incident published in English and Tamil Dailies namely ‘The Hindu’ and ‘Dinathanthi’ are enclosed herewith. Further the paper publication reveals that the Judicial Magistrate, Saidapet recorded the statement from the said Mr.Velmurugan in the Government Hospital. In view of the facts and circumstances, the Registrar-General, High Court of Madras is directed to number the writ petition and place it before The Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice for listing the matter.                                                             (Justice S.M.SUBRAMANIAM)

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 12, 2022

The paper publication regarding the above incident published in English and Tamil Dailies namely ‘The Hindu’ and ‘Dinathanthi’ are enclosed herewith. Further the paper publication reveals that the Judicial Magistrate, Saidapet recorded the statement from the said Mr.Velmurugan in the Government Hospital. In view of the facts and circumstances, the Registrar-General, High Court of Madras is directed to number the writ petition and place it before The Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice for listing the matter.                                                             (Justice S.M.SUBRAMANIAM)

  October 12, 2022   The learned Members of the Bar made a submission before this Court for initiation of appropriate action against the attempt to commit suicide by one Mr.Velmurugan inside the premises...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY O.S.A.Nos. 254 & 255 of 2022 O.S.A.No.254 of 2022 Azizul Karim          ..Appellant. For Appellant(s) : Mr.R.Natarajan For Respondents : Mr.M.Nandhakumar COMMON JUDGMENT

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 12, 2022

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY O.S.A.Nos. 254 & 255 of 2022 O.S.A.No.254 of 2022 Azizul Karim          ..Appellant. For Appellant(s) : Mr.R.Natarajan For Respondents : Mr.M.Nandhakumar COMMON JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:  30.09.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY O.S.A.Nos. 254 & 255 of 2022 O.S.A.No.254 of 2022 Azizul Karim    ...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
A.Nos.335 & 703 of 2021 and A.No.2011 of 2021 in O.P.No.443 of 2021 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. The applicant and respondent got married in the year 2009 and in their wedlock, two children were born to them.  Thereafter, matrimonial disputes arose between the parties.  According to the  applicant/wife, she was subjeced to harassment and also thrown out of the matrimonial home on 12.04.2021 by the respondent/husband while retaining the custody of the minor children with him, which prompted the applicant to knock

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 12, 2022

A.Nos.335 & 703 of 2021 and A.No.2011 of 2021 in O.P.No.443 of 2021 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. The applicant and respondent got married in the year 2009 and in their wedlock, two children were born to them.  Thereafter, matrimonial disputes arose between the parties.  According to the  applicant/wife, she was subjeced to harassment and also thrown out of the matrimonial home on 12.04.2021 by the respondent/husband while retaining the custody of the minor children with him, which prompted the applicant to knock

A.Nos.335 & 703 of 2021 and A.No.2011 of 2021 in O.P.No.443 of 2021 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. The applicant and respondent got married in the year 2009 and in their wedlock, two children were born...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Cont.P.No.2111 of 2022 and Sub.Appl.No.522 of 2022 in WP.No.25213 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. This contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for the wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in WP.No.25213 of 2022 dated 22.09.2022, thereby this Court directed the respondents to grant permission to conduct procession and to conduct public meetings on 02.10.2022 at various places of Tamilnadu subject to the conditions on or before 28.09.2022. S.Prabakaran, the learned Senior Counsel appearing However, it is for the State to maintain law and order problem.  It is made clear that the respondents shall permit the petitioners on their earlier representations to conduct procession and to conduct public meetings on 06.11.2022. Registry is directed to list the matter along with all the connected contempt petitions numbered subsequently on 31.10.2022. 30.09.2022 .

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 12, 2022

Cont.P.No.2111 of 2022 and Sub.Appl.No.522 of 2022 in WP.No.25213 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. This contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for the wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in WP.No.25213 of 2022 dated 22.09.2022, thereby this Court directed the respondents to grant permission to conduct procession and to conduct public meetings on 02.10.2022 at various places of Tamilnadu subject to the conditions on or before 28.09.2022. S.Prabakaran, the learned Senior Counsel appearing However, it is for the State to maintain law and order problem.  It is made clear that the respondents shall permit the petitioners on their earlier representations to conduct procession and to conduct public meetings on 06.11.2022. Registry is directed to list the matter along with all the connected contempt petitions numbered subsequently on 31.10.2022. 30.09.2022 .

Cont.P.No.2111 of 2022 and Sub.Appl.No.522 of 2022 in WP.No.25213 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. This contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for the wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *Murali Vs. The Inspector of Police* Crl.O.P. No. 4980 of 2019 Dated: 26.09.2022 *Honourable Mr. Justice G. Jayachandran* allowed the Criminal Original Petition in the matter relating to *“Quash – FIR – NDPS”* and observed and held as follows:

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 12, 2022

GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *Murali Vs. The Inspector of Police* Crl.O.P. No. 4980 of 2019 Dated: 26.09.2022 *Honourable Mr. Justice G. Jayachandran* allowed the Criminal Original Petition in the matter relating to *“Quash – FIR – NDPS”* and observed and held as follows:

GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *Murali Vs. The Inspector of Police* Crl.O.P. No. 4980 of 2019 Dated: 26.09.2022 *Honourable Mr. Justice G. Jayachandran* allowed the Criminal Original Petition in the matter relating to *“Quash...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version