Law tips Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) RCR ( cri ) 839 : Mariappan V vs state of TN : Existence of circumstances bringing case within exception under section 84 IPC lies on the accused

[9/27, 10:33] Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) RCR ( cri ) 839 : Mariappan V vs state of TN : Existence of circumstances bringing case within exception under section 84 IPC lies on the accused
[9/27, 10:33] Vinothpandian: 2012 (2) crimes 141 : state of orissa vs ujjal kumar burdhan : unless a case of gross abuse of power is made out against those incharge of investigation , high court should avoid interfering at a prematured or preliminary stage of investigation.
[9/28, 09:37] Vinothpandian: 2018 (16) SCC 408 : shafin jahan vs Asokan KM and others : Parental love cannot be allowed to fluster the right of choice of an adult in choosing a man to whom she gets married
[9/28, 09:37] Vinothpandian: 2018 CRI LJ 4298 : sunil CB singh baghel and others vs state of maharastra : With regard to media reporting of criminal trial , sessions judge has no power to pass order banning print , electronic and social media from.publishing posting and reporting court proceedings , it is only high court and supreme court that have power to pass postponement orders in exceptional circumstances for a brief period
[9/28, 10:00] Vinothpandian: 2018 (2) crimes 225 : Asian resurfacing of road agency pvt ltd vs CBI : mandate of speedy justice applies to the prevention of corruption act
[9/28, 10:00] Vinothpandian: 2018 CRI LJ 1557 : khumukcham nikita devi vs state of manipur : A victim can engage a lawyer of her choice to assist the prosecution with the permission of the court ( sec 301 CRPC 1973 )
[9/28, 10:32] Vinothpandian: 2014 (5) SCC 181 : sujoy kumar chanda vs damayanti majhi : unless facts disclose a designed effort to frustrate the cause of justice with malafide , harsh comments should not be made on subordinate courts
[9/29, 10:07] Vinothpandian: 2018 (2) SCC 430 : Dinubhai boghabhai solanki vs state of gujarat : In a criminal proceedings fair trial is possible only when witnesses are truthful
[9/29, 10:07] Vinothpandian: 2018 (1) crimes 125 : shathi mohammad vs state of himachal pradesh : Electronic record can be proved only as per section 65- B of the evidence act
[9/29, 10:14] Vinothpandian: 2018 (1) crimes 125 : shathi mohammad vs state of himachal pradesh : Electronic record can be proved only as per section 65- B of the evidence act
[9/29, 10:14] Vinothpandian: 2018 CRILJ 2632 : gokul alias gokula krishnan and others vs state : power of investigating agency under section 173 (8) CRPC has widest possible sanctity and cannot be restricitive in nature

You may also like...