Court News from Madras High Court

Uncategorized

Kumara Gru Advt: All our advocates are requested to attend the victory celebrations of Sri.C.P.R on his election of Vice President of India today at 1 pm near Aavin gate High Court Madras for distribution of sweets to other advocates and public. Thank you. Kumaraguru

by Sekar Reporter · Published September 10, 2025 · Updated September 10, 2025

[10/09, 09:45] Kumara Gru Advt: All our advocates are requested to attend the victory celebrations of Sri.C.P.R on his election of Vice President of India today at 1 pm near Aavin gate High Court Madras for distribution of sweets to other advocates and public. Thank you. Kumaraguru [10/09, 09:49] Sekarreporter: [10/09, 09:45] Kumara Gru Advt: All our advocates are requested to attend the victory celebrations of Sri.C.P.R on his election of Vice President of India today at 1 pm near Aavin gate High Court Madras for distribution of sweets to other advocates and public. Thank you. Kumaraguru [10/09, 09:49] Sekarreporter: 👍 [10/09, 09:50] Sekarreporter: [10/09, 09:45] Kumara Gru Advt: All our advocates are requested to attend the victory celebrations of Sri.C.P.R on his election of Vice President of India today at 1 pm near Aavin gate High Court Madras for distribution of sweets to other advocates and public. Thank you. Kumaraguru [10/09, 09:49] Sekarreporter: 👍


Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter)
Share on Facebook
Share on Pinterest
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Email










	You may also like...


  		
		

			
				
					        
         																			
							


			

				
					Madras high court news
				


				
					
  September 16, 2021


   by    
      Sekar Reporter
     · Published September 16, 2021
      
				


			


		
	

		
		

			
				
					        
         																			
							


			

				
					Madras high court august 2nd 8 orders round up
				


				
					
  August 3, 2022


   by    
      Sekar Reporter
     · Published August 3, 2022
      
				


			


		
	

		
		

			
				
					        
         																			
							


			

				
					[8/6, 11:11] Mv muralidaran j: I very much Sad about the sudden demise of Reporter Prasad. A good knowledgeble and kindness person. It is great loss family of media and Prasad family.May his soul rest in peace in the heaven. [8/6, 11:49] Sekarreporter 1: 🙏🏼
				


				
					
  August 6, 2020


   by    
      Sekar Reporter
     · Published August 6, 2020


          

	

		

		

			           			
                        Follow:
                      			
			
				
				Next story justices Anita Sumanth and C Kumarappan sought the details while hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by A Radhakrishnan of Salem, seeking a direction to expedite the renovation work and consecration of the temple, and protect the properties of the temple as well as its sub temples.
		
				Previous story Vinothpandian: 2018 CRI LJ 1846 : Balram vs state ( NCT of delhi ) : The statement of a hostile witness can also be examined to the extent that it supports the case of the prosecution
			

			
			
				
					Search for:
					
				
				
			
		
		Recent Posts
		
											
					Hare Krishna hare krishna
									
											
					Head notes cases mhc
									
											
					Madras High Court*  – *Judges:* N. Sathish Kumar and M. Jothiraman – *Parties:* S.M. Vetrivel (Petitioner) vs. The Secretary, Bar Council of India & Ors. (Respondents) – *Date of Order:* November 25, 2025 – *Counsel:*     – For Petitioner: Mr. T. Gowthaman, Senior Counsel for Mr. S. Deepika     – For Respondents: Dr. G. Balu, Senior Panel Counsel for R2, R5, and R6; Mr. C.K. Chandrasekar for R4 – *Court Observation:* The court disposed of the petition, directing the Bar Council to take a decision as per law regarding reservation for persons with benchmark disabilities in future elections. The court clarified that this direction should not come in the way of conducting the ongoing election. The petitioner was given liberty to approach the High Powered Committee appointed by the Supreme Court for exemption from payment of nomination fee.
									
											
					[02/12, 14:25] Sekarreporter: *Madras High Court*  – *Judge:* N. Sathish Kumar – *Parties:* M/s. Fnhn World Resorts India Private Limited (Petitioner) vs. The State of Tamil Nadu (Respondent) – *Date of Order:* Not specified (likely December 2, 2025) – *Counsel:*     – For Petitioner: M. Vijay Anand     – For Respondent: Additional Advocate General J. Ravindran – *Court Observation:* The court directed the Tamil Nadu government to produce documents related to the tender process for conducting the 50th India Tourism and Industrial Fair at Chennai’s Island Grounds. The petitioner alleged that their bid was rejected on flaky grounds, despite their company having successfully conducted the event six times previously. The court adjourned the case to December 4, seeking further clarification on the tender process. [02/12, 14:25] Sekarreporter: 09/NSKJ/18 WP/47251/2025 (Gen. Misc.) M/S. FUN WORLD AND RESORTS INDIA PVT. LTD., VS THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT AND 4 OTHERS. M/S. M.VIJAY ANAND K.S.LEKHA SRI —————— Chennai
									
											
					head note:  *IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS*  *WA No. 3250 of 2025*  *V. Singaravelan vs. The Kattalai Thambiran & Ors.*  *Date of Order: 11-11-2025*  *Coram:*  – Hon’ble Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar – Hon’ble Mr Justice Hemant Chandangoudar  *Counsel:*  – For Appellant: Mr. M. Baskar for Mr. K. B. Vivekanandhan – For Respondents: Mr. Kandhan Duraisami (for R1), Mr. S. Ravee Kumar, Government Pleader (Puducherry) (for R3 and R4)  *Court Observation:*  The Madras High Court directed that only one assistant, instead of two, can assist the Kattalai Thambiran in the internal administration of the temple, considering his advanced age and physical inability to manage the affairs. The court also clarified that this arrangement will continue until further orders or till the final disposal of the writ appeal.
									
					

		

	December 2025
	
	
		M
		T
		W
		T
		F
		S
		S
	
	
	
	1 2 3 4 5 6 7
	
	
		8 9 10 11 12 13 14
	
	
		15 16 17 18 19 20 21
	
	
		22 23 24 25 26 27 28
	
	
		29 30 31
		 
	
	
	

		« Nov
		 
		 
	
		


	


	

	

	

		  		
        More
  		
		
		
		
		
		Recent Posts
		
											
					Hare Krishna hare krishna
									
											
					Head notes cases mhc
									
											
					Madras High Court*  – *Judges:* N. Sathish Kumar and M. Jothiraman – *Parties:* S.M. Vetrivel (Petitioner) vs. The Secretary, Bar Council of India & Ors. (Respondents) – *Date of Order:* November 25, 2025 – *Counsel:*     – For Petitioner: Mr. T. Gowthaman, Senior Counsel for Mr. S. Deepika     – For Respondents: Dr. G. Balu, Senior Panel Counsel for R2, R5, and R6; Mr. C.K. Chandrasekar for R4 – *Court Observation:* The court disposed of the petition, directing the Bar Council to take a decision as per law regarding reservation for persons with benchmark disabilities in future elections. The court clarified that this direction should not come in the way of conducting the ongoing election. The petitioner was given liberty to approach the High Powered Committee appointed by the Supreme Court for exemption from payment of nomination fee.
									
											
					[02/12, 14:25] Sekarreporter: *Madras High Court*  – *Judge:* N. Sathish Kumar – *Parties:* M/s. Fnhn World Resorts India Private Limited (Petitioner) vs. The State of Tamil Nadu (Respondent) – *Date of Order:* Not specified (likely December 2, 2025) – *Counsel:*     – For Petitioner: M. Vijay Anand     – For Respondent: Additional Advocate General J. Ravindran – *Court Observation:* The court directed the Tamil Nadu government to produce documents related to the tender process for conducting the 50th India Tourism and Industrial Fair at Chennai’s Island Grounds. The petitioner alleged that their bid was rejected on flaky grounds, despite their company having successfully conducted the event six times previously. The court adjourned the case to December 4, seeking further clarification on the tender process. [02/12, 14:25] Sekarreporter: 09/NSKJ/18 WP/47251/2025 (Gen. Misc.) M/S. FUN WORLD AND RESORTS INDIA PVT. LTD., VS THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT AND 4 OTHERS. M/S. M.VIJAY ANAND K.S.LEKHA SRI —————— Chennai
									
											
					head note:  *IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS*  *WA No. 3250 of 2025*  *V. Singaravelan vs. The Kattalai Thambiran & Ors.*  *Date of Order: 11-11-2025*  *Coram:*  – Hon’ble Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar – Hon’ble Mr Justice Hemant Chandangoudar  *Counsel:*  – For Appellant: Mr. M. Baskar for Mr. K. B. Vivekanandhan – For Respondents: Mr. Kandhan Duraisami (for R1), Mr. S. Ravee Kumar, Government Pleader (Puducherry) (for R3 and R4)  *Court Observation:*  The Madras High Court directed that only one assistant, instead of two, can assist the Kattalai Thambiran in the internal administration of the temple, considering his advanced age and physical inability to manage the affairs. The court also clarified that this arrangement will continue until further orders or till the final disposal of the writ appeal.


    

    
    
    
    
      

        

        

          
                        
            
                SEKAR REPORTER © 2025. All Rights Reserved.
            


                                                          
                    Powered by  - Designed with the Hueman theme




WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com