Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy of Madras HC has apologised to 4 women litigants on behalf of the society at large because of its misogynist tendency He has tendered second apology for humiliating questions posed to them during cross examination @THChennai [11/25, 10:35] Sekarreporter 1: 17.In the result : i) The Appeal Suit in A.S.No.61 of 2016 is partly allowed; ii) The O.S.No.79 of 2013, on the file of the Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri is decreed on the following t

[11/25, 10:35] Sekarreporter 1: [11/25, 10:32] Sekarreporter 1: 👍
[11/25, 10:33] Sekarreporter 1: Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy of Madras HC has apologised to 4 women litigants on behalf of the society at large because of its misogynist tendency He has tendered second apology for humiliating questions posed to them during cross examination @THChennai
[11/25, 10:35] Sekarreporter 1: 17.In the result : i) The Appeal Suit in A.S.No.61 of 2016 is partly allowed; ii) The O.S.No.79 of 2013, on the file of the Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri is decreed on the following terms: a) The suit properties be divided by metes and bounds into 25 equal shares and the plaintiffs are allotted 19/25th shares and shall be entitled to separate possession thereof; b) That the partition deed registered as document No.52/1999, dated 22.01.1999, marked as A-3 between the deceased V.R.Mani and the second defendant is null and void; c) That the defendants are hereby restrained by means of permanent injunction from making any encumbrances over the suit property ; d) That the plaintiffs are directed to take separate action by filing an application under Order XX Rule 18 of CPC., for mesne profits; e) That the plaintiffs will be entitled to the costs of the suit;           iii) There will be no order as to costs as far as this Appeal Suit is concerned. Consequently the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. https://sekarreporter.com/?p=40114