![Sekarreporter1: ஜூனில் 11ஆம் தேதிவரை மிக முக்கிய வழக்குகள் மட்டுமே விசாரணை – ஐகோர்ட் அறிவித்துள ்ளது் [5/28, 17:03] Sekarreporter1: NOTIFICATION No. 115/2021 Considering the present pandemic situation, it has become imperative to restrict the functioning of the High Court only to extremely urgent matters, and hence the following Sitting Arrangements in the Principal Seat at Madras and](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
Recent Posts
- Judges Should Be More Careful”: SC On Allahabad HC Order Saying “Rape Victim Invited Trouble”
- [15/04, 12:04] sekarreporter1: Justices SM Subramaniam & K Rajasekar of #MadrasHighCourt stays a single judge’s order which ruled against change of CMRL’s alignment to prevent construction of a metro station near a temple at Whites Road in Royapettah @THChennai Backgrounder 👇 [15/04, 12:04] sekarreporter1: .
- Former Judge of the Supreme Court, Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman, today asserted that the basic structure doctrine is here to stay and warned about the dangers of doing away with this doctrine.
- A Governor’s conduct and a judgment of significance
- Justice Dhanabal noted that the investigating agency had failed to produce any evidence apart from the confession against Karthick. Arranging employment for an accused cannot be equated to harbouring, the judge observed.
More
Recent Posts
- Judges Should Be More Careful”: SC On Allahabad HC Order Saying “Rape Victim Invited Trouble”
- [15/04, 12:04] sekarreporter1: Justices SM Subramaniam & K Rajasekar of #MadrasHighCourt stays a single judge’s order which ruled against change of CMRL’s alignment to prevent construction of a metro station near a temple at Whites Road in Royapettah @THChennai Backgrounder 👇 [15/04, 12:04] sekarreporter1: .
- Former Judge of the Supreme Court, Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman, today asserted that the basic structure doctrine is here to stay and warned about the dangers of doing away with this doctrine.
- A Governor’s conduct and a judgment of significance
- Justice Dhanabal noted that the investigating agency had failed to produce any evidence apart from the confession against Karthick. Arranging employment for an accused cannot be equated to harbouring, the judge observed.
