![இரண்டாண்டுகளுக்கு கீழே தண்டனை பெறுபவர் பதவியில் நீடிக்கலாம் என நீங்கள் கூறுவது எம்எல்ஏக்கள் தகுதி இழப்பு தொடர்பான சட்டம்.செந்தில் பாலாஜி எம்எல்ஏ பதவியில் தொடர்வதில் தவறில்லை! ஆனால் அவர் அமைச்சராக தொடரமுடியாது என்பதே எங்கள் வாதம் என சீனியர் வழக்கறிஞர் ராகவாவாச்சாரி பதிலளித்தார்./ admk adv inbadurai [7/22, 09:41] sekarreporter1:](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Smsj full order THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.S.A.No.27 of 2020 -++-The only question of law raised in the present second appeal is that whether the complaint/application filed by the respondent before the Regulatory Authority is maintainable or not. In view of the fact that the completion certificate issued by the Executive Officer, Town Panchayat is not in consonance either with the provisions of the Town and Country Planning Act as well as the building plan approval sanctioned by the Director of Town and Country Planning or in accordance with the provision of the RERA Act, the same cannot be construed as a valid certificate for the purpose of grant of exclusion under Section 3(2)(b) of the RERA Act. The certificate is to be construed as insignificant and irrelevant as far as the RERA Act is concerned and for all purposes, the building is to be treated as on-going project. Therefore, the appellants/builders are bound to comply with the terms and conditions in the project as well as comply with the provisions of various laws governing real estate affairs. Accordingly, this Court has no hesitation in arriving a conclusion that the application/complaint filed by the respondents/apartment owners association is maintainable under the provisions of the RERA Act, 2016 and accordingly, the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal stands confirmed and consequently, Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. The Regulatory Authority is directed to entertain the application/complaint filed by the respondents/apartment owners association and adjudicate the issues on merits and in accordance with law by affording opportunity to all the parties concerned and accordingly, pass speaking final orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
- Previous story Judge v parthoban j notice orderedMADURAI Conservancy worker’s wife moves HC for compensation
Recent Posts
- Wp against TANGEDCO dismissed /THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAMW. P.No.3698 of 2024andW.M.P.Nos.4000, 4001 and 4003 of 2024PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research(an Institution under PSG & Sons Charitable),Rep. by its Managing Trustee,
- Rajes doss case full order / petition dismissed/ Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant suspension of sentence as sought for by the petitioner and, accordingly, the petition for suspension of sentence is dismissed. Consequent upon the dismissal of the aforesaid petition, the petition to exempt the petitioner from surrendering before the trial court is also dismissed.
- Appearing before a special Division Bench of Justices N. Sathish Kumar and D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, Advocate General P.S. Raman said both the institutions had accepted the government’s request and had identified two professors to lead the studies.
- Madras High Court refuses to exempt former special DGP Rajesh Das from surrendering in sexual harassment case
- ராஜேஸ்தாஸ் சம்மந்தப்பட்ட விசாரணை நீதிமன்றத்தில் சரணடைந்து ஜாமீன் கோரி மனு தாக்கல் செய்யலாம். ஜாமீன் மனுவை விசாரிக்கும் அன்றே சட்டத்திற்கு உட்பட்டு தீர்ப்பு வழங்க வேண்டும் என விசாரணை நீதிமன்றத்திற்கு உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளார்
More
Recent Posts
- Wp against TANGEDCO dismissed /THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAMW. P.No.3698 of 2024andW.M.P.Nos.4000, 4001 and 4003 of 2024PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research(an Institution under PSG & Sons Charitable),Rep. by its Managing Trustee,
- Rajes doss case full order / petition dismissed/ Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant suspension of sentence as sought for by the petitioner and, accordingly, the petition for suspension of sentence is dismissed. Consequent upon the dismissal of the aforesaid petition, the petition to exempt the petitioner from surrendering before the trial court is also dismissed.
- Appearing before a special Division Bench of Justices N. Sathish Kumar and D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, Advocate General P.S. Raman said both the institutions had accepted the government’s request and had identified two professors to lead the studies.
- Madras High Court refuses to exempt former special DGP Rajesh Das from surrendering in sexual harassment case
- ராஜேஸ்தாஸ் சம்மந்தப்பட்ட விசாரணை நீதிமன்றத்தில் சரணடைந்து ஜாமீன் கோரி மனு தாக்கல் செய்யலாம். ஜாமீன் மனுவை விசாரிக்கும் அன்றே சட்டத்திற்கு உட்பட்டு தீர்ப்பு வழங்க வேண்டும் என விசாரணை நீதிமன்றத்திற்கு உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளார்