Follow:
- Next story Bangalore District Court Nithyananda Dhanapeetam Of vs Smt.Aarathi S.Rao on 27 May, 2019 IN THE COURT OF XLIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-45) Dated this the 27th day of May, 2019 PRESENT: Smt.Latha, XLIV Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City. O.S.No.5239/2017 old case order
- Previous story Sabarimalai case sc https://youtu.be/slYZeWvWHrY
Recent Posts
- The title. Of the article “Beyond Blood and Marriage” Beyond Blood and Marriage: The Madras High Court and the Constitutional Recognition of Chosen Families By Srimathi Venkatachari In a quiet courtroom of the Madras High Court, a young woman’s freedom
- NOTIFICATION NO. 156 / 2025 I. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR will sit in a Division Bench at 2.15 P.M. on 18.06.2025 and pronounce Judgment in the cases as listed through Video conferencing / Hybrid / Physical Mode. II. HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE
- [18/06, 08:46] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/Tksq1P994r0?si=mYqCIBA7Ji7EZQO7 [18/06, 09:50] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx-jcBzeXVZem2z4LUkBBrzVJM9YE75lcs?si=9PS-SwfZnPNL_B5f
- On this sole ground of non-application of mind, the order impugned in this writ appeal is set aside and the writ appeal is allowed. The matter is remitted to the file of the respondent. Liberty is given to the respondent to issue fresh notice to the appellant. The learned counsel for the appellant on instructions from the appellant gives an undertaking that they would not plead the limitation as a defence. The learned Additional Government Pleader states that the respondent will issue such a revised notice within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. We make it clear that all the contentions of both the parties are left open. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (G.R.S. J.,) & (M.J.R. J.,) 16.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To: State Tax Officer, Ettayapuram, Tuticorin District – 628 902. G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. and M.JOTHIRAMAN, J. ias W.A.(MD)No.1601 of 2021 16.04.2025
- In the light of the above discussion, the view taken by the Judgment in Karupuchetty @ Vaiyapuri v. Papathi and others in AS.No. 148 of 2025 dated 07.03.2025 and Prema v. Nallasellam in A.S.No.588 of 2025 dated 29.04.2025 are over- ruled. The Registry shall continue to adhere to the Appellate Side Rules and issue notice on the appeals being presented and registered. It shall not post the appeals for admission as directed in the aforesaid judgments. If the court so directs, it shall list the appeal for hearing under Order XLI Rule 11. 140. List the appeals before the learned Single Judge tomorrow i.e., on 23.05.2025 for appropriate orders. (G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) & (V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.) 22.05.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No Speaking Order / Non-speaking order KST/NL/KRK G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. KST/NL/KRK A.S.Nos.617,618,619 and 621 of 2025 22.05.2025
More
Recent Posts
- The title. Of the article “Beyond Blood and Marriage” Beyond Blood and Marriage: The Madras High Court and the Constitutional Recognition of Chosen Families By Srimathi Venkatachari In a quiet courtroom of the Madras High Court, a young woman’s freedom
- NOTIFICATION NO. 156 / 2025 I. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR will sit in a Division Bench at 2.15 P.M. on 18.06.2025 and pronounce Judgment in the cases as listed through Video conferencing / Hybrid / Physical Mode. II. HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE
- [18/06, 08:46] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/Tksq1P994r0?si=mYqCIBA7Ji7EZQO7 [18/06, 09:50] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx-jcBzeXVZem2z4LUkBBrzVJM9YE75lcs?si=9PS-SwfZnPNL_B5f
- On this sole ground of non-application of mind, the order impugned in this writ appeal is set aside and the writ appeal is allowed. The matter is remitted to the file of the respondent. Liberty is given to the respondent to issue fresh notice to the appellant. The learned counsel for the appellant on instructions from the appellant gives an undertaking that they would not plead the limitation as a defence. The learned Additional Government Pleader states that the respondent will issue such a revised notice within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. We make it clear that all the contentions of both the parties are left open. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (G.R.S. J.,) & (M.J.R. J.,) 16.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To: State Tax Officer, Ettayapuram, Tuticorin District – 628 902. G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. and M.JOTHIRAMAN, J. ias W.A.(MD)No.1601 of 2021 16.04.2025
- In the light of the above discussion, the view taken by the Judgment in Karupuchetty @ Vaiyapuri v. Papathi and others in AS.No. 148 of 2025 dated 07.03.2025 and Prema v. Nallasellam in A.S.No.588 of 2025 dated 29.04.2025 are over- ruled. The Registry shall continue to adhere to the Appellate Side Rules and issue notice on the appeals being presented and registered. It shall not post the appeals for admission as directed in the aforesaid judgments. If the court so directs, it shall list the appeal for hearing under Order XLI Rule 11. 140. List the appeals before the learned Single Judge tomorrow i.e., on 23.05.2025 for appropriate orders. (G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) & (V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.) 22.05.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No Speaking Order / Non-speaking order KST/NL/KRK G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. KST/NL/KRK A.S.Nos.617,618,619 and 621 of 2025 22.05.2025
