You may also like...
-
writ petitioner has come to Court with unclean hands. He was eminently unfit, as a Panchayat Councillor, to have held a government post. Not content with suppressing that fact, he has the audacity to state that the school ought to have, at best, issued a show cause notice, which it did not do. The writ Court has accepted these indiscretions and engaged in the exercise of computing the sitting fee earned by the writ petitioner and reducing the same from the benefits to be paid by the school. All this, on the premise of severely disputed facts and documents. 22. The order of the writ Court is set aside and these writ appeals are allowed. No costs and connected miscellaneous petitions closed as well. [A.S.M.J.,] & [R.V.J.,] 29.09.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes sm TO: 1.The Director of School Education, (Higher Secondary Schools), D.P.I.Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 006. 2.The District Educational Officer, Kuzhithurai Educational District, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District. DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. AND R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. sm Pre-delivery Common Judgment made in W.A.(MD)Nos.745 of 2015 & 1216 of 2017 Dated: 29.09.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 18, 2023
-
-