Follow:
- Next story VGP dispute: arbitrator’s order set aside judge smsj
- Previous story Justice C.V. Karthikeyan wrote: “It is hoped that at least now they would realise that they survive only on confidence and trust placed by customers and not on the regrettable attitude of their staff/officers.”
Recent Posts
- New govt advts appointed High Court of Madras – Principal Bench No. Name Enrolment No. Post 1. Thiru.R.Ganesh Kumar MS 1387/1998 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side), High Court of Madras 2. Thiru.A.Amarnath MS 1734/2003 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side), High Court of Madras -2- 3. Thiru.S.Yogaraja Sekar MS 4080/2015 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side), High Court of Madras 4. Thiru.C.R.Malarvannan MS 1347/1996 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side), High Court of Madras 5. Thiru.R.Rajasekaran MS 2179/2010 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side), High Court of Madras 2. The Government further order that the advocates appointed in paragraph 1 above shall be paid retainer fee and appearance fee as per the Government Order 2 nd read above. (BY ORDER OF THE GOVERNOR) K.MANIVASAN ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT To: The Advocates concerned, through the Deputy Director, office of the
- HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P(MD)No.11369 of 2026 and W.M.P.(MD).No.8772 of 2026 M/s. Abarna Match Industries, Represented by its Proprietor, D.Ramamoorthy … Petitioner Vs. The State Tax Officer, Commercial Tax Building, Srivilliputhur. …Respondent
- State – Sr Adv John Sathyan*: 1. Influential person targeted women of rival party 2. Speech still circulating despite YouTube takedown 3. Public order affected 4. Bail = encouragement *Court’s oral remark*: _“Speech deleted from YouTube. Why not chargesheet? Will he abscond?”_ *Result*: Judgment reserved, no date.
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxXTUZjlJ272-y1xSvM4DHSsEJuC5eZxbO?si=DW4UPLa7EKvkMSEt [21/05, 14:11] sekarreporter1: PRESS RELEASE** **Madras High Court Grants Interim Stay on Renovation Works at Shri Sowriraja Perumal Temple, Thirukkannapuram** Chennai, May 21, 2026: The Hon’ble Division Bench of the Madras High Court comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.R. Swaminathan and Hon’ble Mr. Justice V. Lakshminarayanan has granted an interim injunction restraining further renovation works being carried out at Shri Sowriraja Perumal Temple, Thirukkannapuram, Nagapattinam District.
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxPoHy98QMuUJlAUaS5YCRB84ee3t__AVv?si=2oGFvnPYeYklVBDI [21/05, 13:44] sekarreporter1: enior Counsel S. R. Rajagopal and S. R. Sundar appeared on behalf of the appellants, while Senior Counsel T. R. Rajagopal and Abdul Hameed appeared on behalf of the 2 to respondents and Indhu advocate for 1st respondent
More
Recent Posts
- New govt advts appointed High Court of Madras – Principal Bench No. Name Enrolment No. Post 1. Thiru.R.Ganesh Kumar MS 1387/1998 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side), High Court of Madras 2. Thiru.A.Amarnath MS 1734/2003 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side), High Court of Madras -2- 3. Thiru.S.Yogaraja Sekar MS 4080/2015 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side), High Court of Madras 4. Thiru.C.R.Malarvannan MS 1347/1996 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side), High Court of Madras 5. Thiru.R.Rajasekaran MS 2179/2010 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side), High Court of Madras 2. The Government further order that the advocates appointed in paragraph 1 above shall be paid retainer fee and appearance fee as per the Government Order 2 nd read above. (BY ORDER OF THE GOVERNOR) K.MANIVASAN ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT To: The Advocates concerned, through the Deputy Director, office of the
- HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P(MD)No.11369 of 2026 and W.M.P.(MD).No.8772 of 2026 M/s. Abarna Match Industries, Represented by its Proprietor, D.Ramamoorthy … Petitioner Vs. The State Tax Officer, Commercial Tax Building, Srivilliputhur. …Respondent
- State – Sr Adv John Sathyan*: 1. Influential person targeted women of rival party 2. Speech still circulating despite YouTube takedown 3. Public order affected 4. Bail = encouragement *Court’s oral remark*: _“Speech deleted from YouTube. Why not chargesheet? Will he abscond?”_ *Result*: Judgment reserved, no date.
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxXTUZjlJ272-y1xSvM4DHSsEJuC5eZxbO?si=DW4UPLa7EKvkMSEt [21/05, 14:11] sekarreporter1: PRESS RELEASE** **Madras High Court Grants Interim Stay on Renovation Works at Shri Sowriraja Perumal Temple, Thirukkannapuram** Chennai, May 21, 2026: The Hon’ble Division Bench of the Madras High Court comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.R. Swaminathan and Hon’ble Mr. Justice V. Lakshminarayanan has granted an interim injunction restraining further renovation works being carried out at Shri Sowriraja Perumal Temple, Thirukkannapuram, Nagapattinam District.
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxPoHy98QMuUJlAUaS5YCRB84ee3t__AVv?si=2oGFvnPYeYklVBDI [21/05, 13:44] sekarreporter1: enior Counsel S. R. Rajagopal and S. R. Sundar appeared on behalf of the appellants, while Senior Counsel T. R. Rajagopal and Abdul Hameed appeared on behalf of the 2 to respondents and Indhu advocate for 1st respondent