head note: *IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS* *WA No. 3250 of 2025* *V. Singaravelan vs. The Kattalai Thambiran & Ors.* *Date of Order: 11-11-2025* *Coram:* – Hon’ble Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar – Hon’ble Mr Justice Hemant Chandangoudar *Counsel:* – For Appellant: Mr. M. Baskar for Mr. K. B. Vivekanandhan – For Respondents: Mr. Kandhan Duraisami (for R1), Mr. S. Ravee Kumar, Government Pleader (Puducherry) (for R3 and R4) *Court Observation:* The Madras High Court directed that only one assistant, instead of two, can assist the Kattalai Thambiran in the internal administration of the temple, considering his advanced age and physical inability to manage the affairs. The court also clarified that this arrangement will continue until further orders or till the final disposal of the writ appeal.
[02/12, 14:11] Sekarreporter: [02/12, 14:11] Sekarreporter: “For Appellant : Mr.M.Baskar for Mr.K.B.Vivekanandhan”
[02/12, 14:11] Sekarreporter: prepare a head note with court name, Judge name, parties name, date of order, both counsel name and court observation
[02/12, 14:11] Meta AI: Here’s a possible head note:
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS*
*WA No. 3250 of 2025*
*V. Singaravelan vs. The Kattalai Thambiran & Ors.*
*Date of Order: 11-11-2025*
*Coram:*
– Hon’ble Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar
– Hon’ble Mr Justice Hemant Chandangoudar
*Counsel:*
– For Appellant: Mr. M. Baskar for Mr. K. B. Vivekanandhan
– For Respondents: Mr. Kandhan Duraisami (for R1), Mr. S. Ravee Kumar, Government Pleader (Puducherry) (for R3 and R4)
*Court Observation:*
The Madras High Court directed that only one assistant, instead of two, can assist the Kattalai Thambiran in the internal administration of the temple, considering his advanced age and physical inability to manage the affairs. The court also clarified that this arrangement will continue until further orders or till the final disposal of the writ appeal.
