You may also like...
-
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.2627 of 2014 U.Manickavel .. Petitioner vs. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Deivanandam For Respondents : Mr.S.Prabhakaran, Government Advocate. INTERIM ORDER Mr.Mathew David, Assistant Commissioner, Estate Welfare and Community Policing, Vepery, Chennai – 600 007, is present.
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 14, 2022
-
GLIMPSE OF A LATEST tax VERDICT* Rich Feel Health and Beauty P. Ltd. v. IT Officer Reported: [2022] 440 ITR 41 (Bom) Dated: 15.11.2021 *Hon’ble Justice K.R. Shriram and Hon’ble Justice Amit B. Borkar* in the matters relating to *“Section 148 of IT Act, 1961 – Reassessment
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 25, 2022
-
Full order THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.A.No.2814 of 2015–In the present case, the Railways could not able to establish that it is a case of trespass. This being the facts and circumstances, the order dated 08.09.2015 passed in O.A.(II-U).No.261 of 2014 is set aside and the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in C.M.A.No.2814 of 2015 stands allowed.
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 13, 2021