Follow:
- Next story Justice G R Swaminathan observed that the relationship between the parties is contractual in nature and the rights of the parties will have to be determined in terms of the contract. Citing that there was no force majeure clause in the agreement between the parties, the judge said that in the tender notification, there is a stipulation that the licensee will not be excused from his payment obligation under any circumstance. The judge observed that the court would be justified in treating the lockdown as a force majeure event. The judge said that the GO was issued waiving the rental amount for two months based on the letter sent by the commissioner of municipal administration in June 2020. No one would have anticipated that the lockdown would continue for several more months.
- Previous story Sekarreporter1: [2/6, 19:03] Meera Bar Bench: https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/human-rights-act-decisions-of-human-rights-commission-binding-on-state-madras-high-court [2/6, 19:34] Sekarreporter1: [2/6, 19:36] Sekarreporter1: [2/6, 19:05] Leaf Let Web Paras Nath Singh: https://www.theleaflet.in/recomme
Recent Posts
- MR.JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Cont.P.No.3821 of 2024 and
- MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl.A.(MD).No.522 of 2019 Chellapandian … Appellant Vs. State represented by Assistant Superintendent of Police, Kamuthi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. (Crime No.256 of 2015) … Respondent
- Fine MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Cont.P.No.2790 of 2024 — 1. Mrs.R.Lalithambai, D/o Sivapatha Mudaliar 2. Mr.K.S.Viswanathan, S/o Sivapatha Mudaliar .. Petitioners Vs. Thiru.Anshul Mishra, IAS., The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Gandhi Irwain Road, Egmore,
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Writ Petition(MD)Nos.14567 & 14654 of 2025 and
- We are of the considered opinion that the court would not be in a position to fix the time and date with regard to the performance of the Kumbhabhishekam, and it has to be decided by the concerned experts. Therefore, we are inclined to form a committee consisting of the following members: 1) Sthanikar and Vidhayahar of Arulmighu Subramaniya Swamy Thirukoil (petitioner in W.P(MD)No.14567 of 2025); 2) Sivasri K.Pitchai Gurukkal, Chief Priest of Sri Karpaga Vinayagar Temple, Pillaiyarpatti;
More
Recent Posts
- MR.JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Cont.P.No.3821 of 2024 and
- MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl.A.(MD).No.522 of 2019 Chellapandian … Appellant Vs. State represented by Assistant Superintendent of Police, Kamuthi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. (Crime No.256 of 2015) … Respondent
- Fine MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Cont.P.No.2790 of 2024 — 1. Mrs.R.Lalithambai, D/o Sivapatha Mudaliar 2. Mr.K.S.Viswanathan, S/o Sivapatha Mudaliar .. Petitioners Vs. Thiru.Anshul Mishra, IAS., The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Gandhi Irwain Road, Egmore,
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Writ Petition(MD)Nos.14567 & 14654 of 2025 and
- We are of the considered opinion that the court would not be in a position to fix the time and date with regard to the performance of the Kumbhabhishekam, and it has to be decided by the concerned experts. Therefore, we are inclined to form a committee consisting of the following members: 1) Sthanikar and Vidhayahar of Arulmighu Subramaniya Swamy Thirukoil (petitioner in W.P(MD)No.14567 of 2025); 2) Sivasri K.Pitchai Gurukkal, Chief Priest of Sri Karpaga Vinayagar Temple, Pillaiyarpatti;
