Follow:
- Next story THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. KIRUBAKARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN W.P. No. 8642 of 2020 Mrs.T. Arputham In view of the undisputed facts regarding multiple co-morbid illness being suffered by the petitioner’s son, his chances of getting infection being higher and not being given treatment in Government General Hospital as well as Stanley Medical College Hospital due to pandemic situation and ripe age and illness of the parents of the convict, who is away from them for the past 29 years, it is appropriate to direct the Government to grant 30 days leave to the petitioner’s son relaxing Rule 22(3) under Rule 40 of the Rules, for the reasons stated above, within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the leave granted is subject to the satisfaction of the following terms and conditions and other relevant provisions of the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982, as imposed in paragraph Nos. 4 & 5 of G.O.(2D) No. 300 Home (Pri.III) Department dated 23.09.2017, which are extracted as follows:
- Previous story Samd case msnj bench questions
Recent Posts
- The Registrar General, High Court, Madras, is also hereby directed to call for a status report from the Subordinate Courts, as to how many cases are pending without executing the Non-Bailable Warrants and without filing compliance reports, on or before 23.07.2025. Post the matter under the caption ”For Filing Reports” on 24.07.2025. 01.07.2025 ms To 1. The Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-I, Allikulam. 2. The Inspector of Police (Law & Order), J-8, Neelankarai Police Station, Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 4. The Registrar General, High Court, Madras. 5. The Director General of Police, Chennai. 6. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Chennai. P.VELMURUGAN, J ms Crl.O.P.No.18139 of 2025 01.07.2025
- Currently, at least 27 advocates, including four women who were recommended between January 2023 and April 2025, still await any word from the government.
- court updates
- MR. JUSTICE C. KUMARAPPAN Writ Petition No.22169 of 2025 and Writ Miscellaneous Petition No.
- We should have ordered restoration of possession to the petitioner. Since the area encroached is land belonging to the Highways, we do not resort to restoration. We direct the Government to pay a compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- to the petitioner within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Government may recover the said compensation from the officers who are responsible for carrying out the erroneous eviction drive by taking law into their own hands without following the procedure contemplated under the Act. 10. This Contempt Petition is disposed of as above. (R.S.M., J.) (P.B.B., J.) 08.07.2025 dsa Index : No Internet : Yes Neutral Citation : No Speaking order R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and P.B.BALAJI, J. dsa Contempt Petition No.3436 of 2024 08.07.20
More
Recent Posts
- The Registrar General, High Court, Madras, is also hereby directed to call for a status report from the Subordinate Courts, as to how many cases are pending without executing the Non-Bailable Warrants and without filing compliance reports, on or before 23.07.2025. Post the matter under the caption ”For Filing Reports” on 24.07.2025. 01.07.2025 ms To 1. The Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-I, Allikulam. 2. The Inspector of Police (Law & Order), J-8, Neelankarai Police Station, Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 4. The Registrar General, High Court, Madras. 5. The Director General of Police, Chennai. 6. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Chennai. P.VELMURUGAN, J ms Crl.O.P.No.18139 of 2025 01.07.2025
- Currently, at least 27 advocates, including four women who were recommended between January 2023 and April 2025, still await any word from the government.
- court updates
- MR. JUSTICE C. KUMARAPPAN Writ Petition No.22169 of 2025 and Writ Miscellaneous Petition No.
- We should have ordered restoration of possession to the petitioner. Since the area encroached is land belonging to the Highways, we do not resort to restoration. We direct the Government to pay a compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- to the petitioner within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Government may recover the said compensation from the officers who are responsible for carrying out the erroneous eviction drive by taking law into their own hands without following the procedure contemplated under the Act. 10. This Contempt Petition is disposed of as above. (R.S.M., J.) (P.B.B., J.) 08.07.2025 dsa Index : No Internet : Yes Neutral Citation : No Speaking order R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and P.B.BALAJI, J. dsa Contempt Petition No.3436 of 2024 08.07.20
