![N.SATHISH KUMAR CRL.O.P.No.20070 of 2020 https://www.sekarreporter.com/rs-barathi-casecrl-o-p-no-20070-of-2020-before-the-madurai-bench-of-madras-high-court-dated-22-02-2021-coram-the-honourable-mr-justice-n-sathish-kumar-crl-o-p-no-20070-of-2020/ [2/27, 07:45] Sekarreporter1: [2/27, 07:41] Sekarreporter1: CRL.O.P.No.20070 of 2020](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Tasmac appeal has been listed before SC tomorrow. The Supreme Court may not hear the appeal since a Full Bench of Madras HC is now seized of the matter.
- Previous story [5/14, 19:11] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/ThanthiTV/status/1260926312505421825?s=08 [5/14, 19:12] Sekarreporter 1: #Breaking || தமிழக டாஸ்மாக் மதுக்கடை திறப்பு தொடர்பான வழக்கு * உச்ச நீதிமன்றத்தில் நாளை விசாரணை * தமிழக அரசின் மேல் முறையீட்டு மனு மீது விசாரணை #TASMAC | #SupremeCourt | #TNGovt https://t.co/edHWKQb3Yr
Recent Posts
- Tasmac சோதனை தொடர்பாக மேற்கொண்டு எந்த நடவடிக்கையும் எடுக்கவில்லை திங்கட்கிழமை (மார்ச் 24) வரை மேற்கொள்ள வேண்டாம் என அமலாக்கத் துறைக்கு ஐகோர்ட் வாய்மொழி அறிவுறுத்தல்
- MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN W.A.Nos. 567, 1458 and 1460 of 2024 and CMP Nos.3936, 10380 and 10389 of 2024 WA No.567 of 2024 S.Selvaraj
- MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR W.P.No.35158 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.38070 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.2306 of 2025 Kavitha Anand
- Justice S. Sounthar held, “Therefore, Section 21(g) of the ART Act creates a legal right for woman above the age of 21 years and below the age of 50 years to demand ART services as a matter of right, subject to conditions prescribed under Act…In other words, the woman outside the age bracket prescribed under the section, though may desire for ART services,
- Justice GR Swaminathan and Justice R Poornima held that the fundamental right of privacy included spousal privacy also and the contours of spousal privacy included a woman’s sexual autonomy. Highlighting that self pleasure was not a forbidden fruit
More
Recent Posts
- Tasmac சோதனை தொடர்பாக மேற்கொண்டு எந்த நடவடிக்கையும் எடுக்கவில்லை திங்கட்கிழமை (மார்ச் 24) வரை மேற்கொள்ள வேண்டாம் என அமலாக்கத் துறைக்கு ஐகோர்ட் வாய்மொழி அறிவுறுத்தல்
- MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN W.A.Nos. 567, 1458 and 1460 of 2024 and CMP Nos.3936, 10380 and 10389 of 2024 WA No.567 of 2024 S.Selvaraj
- MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR W.P.No.35158 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.38070 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.2306 of 2025 Kavitha Anand
- Justice S. Sounthar held, “Therefore, Section 21(g) of the ART Act creates a legal right for woman above the age of 21 years and below the age of 50 years to demand ART services as a matter of right, subject to conditions prescribed under Act…In other words, the woman outside the age bracket prescribed under the section, though may desire for ART services,
- Justice GR Swaminathan and Justice R Poornima held that the fundamental right of privacy included spousal privacy also and the contours of spousal privacy included a woman’s sexual autonomy. Highlighting that self pleasure was not a forbidden fruit
