You may also like...
-
Judge இளந்திரையன். அதிரடி உத்தரவு. On perusal of the accident register, discharge summary and report submitted by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruvannamalai revealed that without committing any fault, the petitioner and his family members i.e. his wife and his son were brutally attacked by respondents 5 to 7 herein, that too in a public place in front of general public. They were also abused using their caste name. Even then, no FIR has been registered against them so far. Therefore, this Court is inclined to issue the following directions. (i) The third respondent is directed to initiate departmental proceedings as against respondents 5 to 7 herein forthwith. (ii) The first respondent is directed to pay compensation of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) to each of the victims i.e. the petitioner, his wife and his son forthwith and the said compensation amount to be recovered from respondents 5 to 7 herein in accordance with law. (iii) The third respondent is directed to register FIR against respondents 5 to 7 herein forthwith and to complete the investigation within a period of twelve weeks from the date of registration of FIR. (iv) The Disciplinary Authority is directed to keep respondents 5 to 7 herein under suspension till the completion of disciplinary proceedings. 6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 30.10.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking order/non-speaking order lok To 1.The Secretary, Home Department, Government of Tamilnadu, Fort St.George, Chennai 2.The Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of Tamilnadu, Fort St.George, Chennai 3.The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvannamalai District 4.The District Collector, O/o.the Collectorate, Thiruvannamalai District 5.The Government Advocate, High Court of Madras G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok W.P.No.24290 of 2016 30.10.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 2, 2023
-
While deciding the issue pertaining to the right claimed by the writ petitioner to conduct prayer meetings in the subject premises, which was asserted by the petitioner to be a right which is inherent to Christianity and consequently a right guaranteed under the Constitution for practicing his religion, Hon’ble Justice N. Anand Venkatesh penning a judgment *dismissing the writ petition* on
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 29, 2021
-
Twin Judges in Conservative v. Liberal Terrain – Does Law Have All The Answers? Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan Justices V Parthiban & N Anand Venkatesh Textualist v. Evolutionist. Conservative v. Liberal. Stephen Bryer v. Antonin Scalia. G. S. Singhvi v. D Y Chandrachud. You can go on and on. The feelings and faculties that are triggered from this debate could be multiple. There could be appreciation, understanding, outrage and/or even revulsion, convulsion from the construct, put upon constitutional law, by either side.
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 30, 2021