You may also like...
Justices M M Sundresh and S Ananthi observed that they do not find any merit in this appeal. The single judge went into the issue at length. There are two people, namely – Kalyani and Kasthuri Kannan, similarly placed to the three women respondents in the present appeal, who were directed to be given the relief, in pursuant to the orders of the court.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 23, 2021
Sekarreporter Today law points 3.02.2021, K. Selvaraj, MHC Advocate: Earlier, the inclusion of an Act in 9th Schedule validates it with retrospective effect from the date of its enactment, irrespective of its inconsistency with any fundamental right. Acts added to the 9th Schedule on or after 24.4.1973 will not receive the protection of Article 31B. They will be valid only if they do not damage or destroy the basic structure of the Constitution. (1981) 2 SCC 362 Wamana Rao -vs- UOI (2007) 2 SCC 1 I.R. Coelho -vs- State of Tamil Nadu
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 3, 2021