You may also like...
-
https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1728635902275297285?t=mRhVt9RvX4IMUz4KbAdChg&s=08 WP 6692 of 2022, Petitioner Mr. Chellappan Manoj Kumar, Judgement delivered by Hon’ble Mr Justice. Krishnan Ramasamy & Argued by Dr. B. Ramaswamy for the Income Tax. The petitioner pleaded to quash the impugned notice U/s. 148 of the IT act on reopening of assessment. Hon’ble Judge of the opinion that, the impugned notice issued by the respondent U/s. 148 of IT act shall be construed as notice u/s. 148A(b), there is no need for quashing any notice sent by IT dept. The department would proceed as per the law and as the supreme court guideline
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 26, 2023
-
Madras high court orders december 28 th
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 28, 2021
-
[4/29, 15:11] Sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/1vX1NC2cTlw [4/29, 15:11] Sekarreporter1: What Centre Has Been Doing For Past 14 Months? Madras High Court Questions COVID Management Plan https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/what-centre-has-been-doing-for-past-14-months-madras-high-court-questions-covid-management-plan-173323
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 29, 2021