Follow:
- Next story Setting aside the Thanjavur collector’s order which rejected an arbitration application on the ground that it was filed outside the prescribed period, the Madras high court held that there is no time limit specified for applying before the arbitrator under the National Highways Act, 1956. Justice S S Sundar observed that even otherwise if the Limitation Act, 1963, was applied in the case, the period prescribed under section 137, which is applicable in the present case, the appeal was filed well before time. “From the facts of the case in hand, this court is satisfied that the appeal had been filed within the prescribed time. Hence, this court has no hesitation to hold that the order passed by the collector dismissing the appeal on the ground of limitation is not only illegal on accounts of the judgements of the earlier division bench of this court, but also by accepting the case of the collector regarding application of Limitation Act,” observed the judge.
- Previous story The Madurai Bench of Madras High Courtheld that registered person making zero rated supply shall be eligible to claim IGSTrefunds, irrespective of the circular on clarifications on exports related refund issues (Circular No.37/2018-Customs, dated 09.10.2018). The ruling was made by a single bench consisting of Justice M.Govindaraj, in the case of M/s.Precot Meridian Limited v. The Commissioner of Customs and Anr.
Recent Posts
- நீதிபதிகள் G.R.சுவாமிநாதன், R.பூர்ணிமா
- MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P. No. 15120 of 2019 and W.M.P.NO. 8422 of 2024 G.Subramania Koushik S/o.R.Gopal Iyer, No.47, Vijaya
- MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA C.M.A(MD) Nos.460 & 1515 of 2024 and C.M.P.(MD)No.15844 of 2024 L.Santhanakrishnan
- DR. JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE W.P. No.19503 of 2020 and W.M.P. No. 24112 of 2020 The Management, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Limited
- Matter was mentioned last week by B. Jagannath, learned counsel for Petitioner and through precipice a request was made – the same was accepted & listed today in the caption Mentioned cases – Item 27 before the Honourable Madras High Court. Learned First Bench of Honourable Chief Justice and Honourable Mr Justice Mohammed Shafiq.
More
Recent Posts
- நீதிபதிகள் G.R.சுவாமிநாதன், R.பூர்ணிமா
- MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P. No. 15120 of 2019 and W.M.P.NO. 8422 of 2024 G.Subramania Koushik S/o.R.Gopal Iyer, No.47, Vijaya
- MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA C.M.A(MD) Nos.460 & 1515 of 2024 and C.M.P.(MD)No.15844 of 2024 L.Santhanakrishnan
- DR. JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE W.P. No.19503 of 2020 and W.M.P. No. 24112 of 2020 The Management, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Limited
- Matter was mentioned last week by B. Jagannath, learned counsel for Petitioner and through precipice a request was made – the same was accepted & listed today in the caption Mentioned cases – Item 27 before the Honourable Madras High Court. Learned First Bench of Honourable Chief Justice and Honourable Mr Justice Mohammed Shafiq.
