You may also like...
-
6.One can note that that the buck stops with the nodal officer. The involvement of the officials above the said rank may not really arise. During the relevant time, Shri.S.Davidson Devasirvatham, IPS was the Commissioner of Police, Madurai City. Had the final report been filed before the public interest litigation was instituted in the year 2021 ; had the time limit laid down by the Hon’ble Division Bench been adhered to ; had the sanctioning authorities accorded sanction without delay, the present controversy would not have arisen at all. I give a clean chit to Shri.S.Davidson Devasirvatham IPS. At the same time, I compliment Shri.K.Annamalai, the State Bharatiya Janata Party President for having taken up the cause. He has played the role of a watch dog in a democracy. But for him the matter would not have come to light. 7.The writ petition is allowed. No costs. 27.07.2022 skm To 1.The Regional Passport Officer, Claret Plaza, Melakkal Main Road, Kochadai, Madurai – 625 016. 2.The State, rep.by the Inspector of Police, Q Branch CID Police Station, Madurai. G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. skm W.P.(MD)No.13544 of 2022 27.07.2022
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 27, 2022
-
The petitioner said if special courts were set up in every district, offenders would not escape the clutches of law and pendency of cases could be tackled effectively. He pointed out that India’s National Wildlife Action Plan 2017-2035 had recommended setting up of special courts. A Division Bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Sathish Kumar ordered notice to the Centre and the State, seeking their response. The court suo motu added the High Court Registrar as a respondent in the petition. The case was adjourned till February 23.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 13, 2021
-
THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA O.P.No.20 of 2010O.P.No.20 of 2010 award. In these circumstances, there is no infirmity or perversity in the finding of the learned arbitrator. Therefore, I do not find any ground for interfering with the award in so far it related to the second heading, namely, Claim for the payment of penal interest for the delay in payment of final bill. In fine, the award is set aside with reference to compensation granted under the head of loss of overhead charges and erosion of profit. However it is confirmed with reference to the interest granted on the delayed payment of money to the contract. The Original Petition is therefore partly allowed.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 10, 2020
