SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 365 : Balaji baliram mupade vs state of maharastra : judgements normally to be prounounced within 2 months of conclusion of arguments , on expiry of 3 months parties can file application in high court seeking early judgement

by ·

    [3/30, 09:40] Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 365 : Balaji baliram mupade vs state of maharastra : judgements normally to be prounounced within 2 months of conclusion of arguments , on expiry of 3 months parties can file application in high court seeking early judgement
    [3/30, 09:40] Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 261 : bharat petroleum corporation ltd vs P umapathy : order 2 rule 2CPC 1908 intended to prevent multiplicity of proceedings , not throw out genuine litigant at threshold
    [4/7, 11:33] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : state of west Bengal vs Dipak mishra SLP no 2669- 2670 of 2021 dated 26- 03 – 2021 : Public interest litigation for stay on withdrawal from prosecution cannot be thrown out only because petitioner belongs to rival political party
    [4/7, 11:33] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : state of Uttar pradesh vs jail superintendent WP ( criminal ) no 409 of 2020 dated 26 – 03- 2021 : convict or under trial prisoner who disobeys law of land cannot oppose his transfer from one prison to another , transfer of criminal proceedings and trial under section 406 of code of criminal procedure , 1973 maintainable at instance of state
    [4/7, 13:26] Vinothpandian: 2012 (10) SCC 167 : Hindustan copper ltd vs monarch gold mining co ltd : powers and functions of the chief justice or his designate adjudicatory and judicial cannot be exercised in piece meal manner ( section 11(6) of the arbitration and conciliation act )
    [4/7, 13:26] Vinothpandian: 2014 (1) SCC 479 : jagdhish singh vs Heeralal and others : irrespective of whether civil court has jurisdiction or not , any person can invoke section 17 of the SARFASI act to challenge measures adopted by creditor
    [4/8, 11:13] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : shital fibres ltd vs indian acrylics ltd SLP ( civil ) no 2353 of 2017 dated 6- 04- 2021 : while admitting petition for winding up , it is not necessary to establish that entire claim is undisputed ( sec 433 (e) companies act 1956 )
    [4/8, 11:14] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : indus biotech pvt ltd vs kotak india venture ( off shore ) fund civil appeal no 1070 of 2021 dated 26- 03- 2021 : Arbitration reference not maintainable if filed after admission of application for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution admitted
    [4/9, 05:50] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : state of Uttar pradesh & others vs manoj kumar Sharma SLP no 7487 of 2020 dated 6- 04 – 2021 : frequent causal and lackadaisical summoning of high officials by court cannot be appreciated
    [4/9, 05:50] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : The state of Rajasthan & others vs love kush meena civil appeal no 3894 of 2020 dated 24 – 03 – 2021 : Acquittal from criminal case charged with serious offences based on benefit of doubt not create opportunity or make a candidate eligible for appointment

You may also like...