Vinothpandian: 2018 CRI LJ 1557 : khumukcham nikita devi vs state of manipur : A victim can engage a lawyer of her choice to assist the prosecution with the permission of the court ( sec 301 CRPC 1973 )

[2/4, 10:56] Vinothpandian: 2018 CRI LJ 1557 : khumukcham nikita devi vs state of manipur : A victim can engage a lawyer of her choice to assist the prosecution with the permission of the court ( sec 301 CRPC 1973 )
[2/4, 10:56] Vinothpandian: 2018 CRI LJ 2207 : Kasimuddin Ahammad and others vs Rajjak Ali and another : The magistrate has the power to direct for further investigation only after filing of the police report in terms of section 173 ( 6) CRPC
[2/4, 10:56] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) MLJ 236 : ICOMM Tele ltd vs punjab state water supply & sewerage board : Terms of invitation to tender being in realm of contract not open to judicial scrutiny unless they are arbitrary , discriminatory or actuated by malice
[2/4, 10:56] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 100 : Assistant commissioner ( CT ) Anna salai 111 Assessment circle vs indian overseas bank ; financial institutions being secured creditors would have priority of charge over mortgaged property in regard to tax another dues ( sec 31 – B SARFASI act )
[2/4, 10:56] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) DRTC 673 : K padma vs K Ramachandran & others : Property attached in favour of bank earlier to alleged agreement for sale , provisions of sec 64 of CPC not applicable
[2/4, 10:56] Vinothpandian: 2014 (16) SCC 1 : Pooja Ravinder devidasani vs state of maharastra : To attract a case under sec 141 of the NI act a specific role must have been played by a director of the company for fastening vicarious liability
[2/4, 10:56] Vinothpandian: 2014 (1) CTC 726 : sathu dharmananda saraswathi swamigal trust vs sree shanmugha seva sangam.nattar trust : CPC 1908 order 17 held no law says that once memo is filed stating petition of transfer is filed matter to be adjourned
[2/6, 11:30] Vinothpandian: 2011 (2) DMC 159 : M muruganandam vs M megala : In a petition under section 482 CRPC even if a person has an excellent case on merits , it cannot be ground for quashing of proceedings since in a petition to quash the court cannot look into the evidence
[2/6, 11:31] Vinothpandian: 2018 CRI LJ 894 : mohammed hussain vs Tharvej bhanu : Remedy under section 482 CRPC is an extraordinary remedy and powers under section 482 CRPC can be invoked only to protect an honest litigant from a dishonest prosecution
[2/6, 11:34] Vinothpandian: 2014 (1) CPJ 128 ( NC ) : manager UCO bank vs santosh kumar Ray : In a proceedings before the consumer forum , a complaint against Banks official cannot be maintained if bank is not impleaded as party
[2/6, 11:34] Vinothpandian: 2008 (2) CPJ 157 ( NC ) : Alice garg vs laxmi vilas hotel : Change of date in verification of affidavit is not a ground of doubt , non – mentioning of parentage and addresses are not relevant in determining the genuineness of affidavit
[2/6, 11:35] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) CPJ 433 ( NC ) : PCARDB through its CEO vs shri satbir singh : In a consumer forum proceedings , damages towards deficiency in service cannot be granted to disgrace a person , amount should be based on logic

You may also like...