Vinothpandian: 2014 (1) DRTC 627 : Jks infra structure pvt ltd vs Edelweiss asset reconstruction co ltd : once notice under section 13(2) of SARFASI act is issued , said notice constitutes attachment of secured

[9/23, 09:34] Vinothpandian: 2014 (1) DRTC 627 : Jks infra structure pvt ltd vs Edelweiss asset reconstruction co ltd : once notice under section 13(2) of SARFASI act is issued , said notice constitutes attachment of secured assets
[9/23, 09:34] Vinothpandian: 2013(1) DRTC 761 : Ratan kumar & others vs state bank of india : Any third party right created after issuance of notice under section 13(2) of SARFASI act has to be ignored
[9/23, 09:46] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1) DRTC 489 : smt shadhna shukla vs debts recovery appellate tribunal : In pursuance to auction under SARFASI act , after accepting bid and confirming sale as per provisions of SARFASI act , auction purchaser becomes absolute owner of that property
[9/23, 09:46] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) DRTC 426 : Madhuri devi vs dena bank : once objection is filed by the borrower against notice issued under section 13(2) of SARFASI act , bank is obliged to file reply to same under section 13 ( 3 – A) SARFASI act
[9/23, 09:59] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) DRTC 505 : jose Antony thottassery vs Anil kuruvilla & others : SARFASI act does not contain any provision enabling opposite party to raise a plea of set off or counter claim
[9/24, 11:32] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) DRTC 841 : K sami vs branch manager , bank of india : mere decision.of financial institution.to approach magistrate under sec 14 would also constitute a measure under sec 13 (4) of the SARFASI act
[9/24, 11:32] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 277 : Bhagwati printers pvt ltd vs IDBI bank ltd : An order rejecting or granting an aplication for condonation of delay in filing an application under sec 17 SARFASI 2002 is an order under sec 17 of the SARFASI act and it would be appealable under sec 18 of the act
[9/24, 11:32] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) DRTC 525 : Bank of baroda vs Ranjan chetia : suit in question involving allegations of fraud against defendants before DRT , held allegations can be tried by civil court only , not by DRT which has no power to pass decree but can only issue recovery certificates
[9/25, 10:58] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) DRTC 404 : Bobby sebastin & another vs ICICI bank and another : only an officer of bank as specified by board of directors can issue a notice of demand under sec 13(2) of the SARFASI.act as contemplated under rule 2(b) of the security interest rules
[9/25, 10:58] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) DRTC 86 : Union bank of india vs Rajendra wadhwa & others : As per rule 8(2) of the security interest rules possession notice is to be published in leading newspapers not later than seven days from date of taking possession
[9/25, 10:58] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) DRTC 27 SC : mathew varghese vs Amrita kumari : section 13 (8) engrafted in SARFASI act primarily with a view to protect right of a borrower , such a ownership right being a constitutional right protected under art 300 A of the constitution