Vinothpandian: 1992 SCC ( cri ) 192 : state of bihar vs PP sharma : criminal proceedings challenged on ground of malafides on the part of the complainant and investigating officer , permitting the investigation tol

[12/16, 10:55] Vinothpandian: 1992 SCC ( cri ) 192 : state of bihar vs PP sharma : criminal proceedings challenged on ground of malafides on the part of the complainant and investigating officer , permitting the investigation to complete without complaining about the malafides or bias to higher authorities amounted to waiver of the objection
[12/16, 10:55] Vinothpandian: 1993 (4) SCC 25 : Home secy UT chandigarh vs darshjit singh grewal : Rule of promissory estoppel held cannot be invoked against a statutory provision or to support an ultra vires act or to compel the government or a public authority to carry out a promise which is contrary to law or ultra vires its powers
[12/16, 14:19] Vinothpandian: 2012 (2) DRTC 412 : sundaram BNP paribas home finance ltd vs Mir ali : loan amount secured by mortgage , cannot seek prohibitory order against garnishee by way of interim measure of protection under sec 9 of the arbitration and coincilation act 1996
[12/16, 14:19] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) DRTC 314 : state bank of india vs national housing bank : statements made before commission are expressly made inadmissible in any subsequent proceedings be it civil or criminal , courts are not bound by conclusions and findings rendered by such commission ( commission of inquiry act 1952 )

 

You may also like...