You may also like...
-
28. In the result, both the impugned orders i.e., orders passed by the Disciplinary Authority, dated 10.03.1999 as well as the Appellate Authority dated 10.08.1999 are hereby quashed. As a sequel, the petitioner shall be entitled to get service benefits which are available to 27/30 W.P. No. 977 of 2007 him under the relevant service rules. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed as indicated above. However, there shall be no order as to cost. 05.01.2021 Index: Yes Speaking Order: Yes vji 28/30. Judge r sureskumar
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 23, 2021
-
Nkkj velmurugan j order this Court suo motu invokes Article 226 to consider the larger issues of bribing of doctors and overpricing of drugs by Pharmaceutical Companies, as they directly affect citizens violating their rights under Article 21 of Constitution of India. This Constitutional Court cannot restrict itself to the issue involved in the appeal and it is duty bound to issue remedial directions to address the above larger issues. 13.Hence, this Court, Suo motu, impleads the (i).Union of India, represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi;
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 8, 2020
-
சுற்றுசூழல் ஆர்வலர் திஷா ரவி மீதான தேசதுரோகம் மற்றும் சதிச்செயல் வழக்கு
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 23, 2021