Skip to content

Search for:

Home
Gallery
Contact Us

Court News from Madras High Court

Home
Gallery
Contact Us

Uncategorized

Today mhc judges advts cricket match player detail s

by Sekar Reporter · January 25, 2020

[1/25, 07:45] sekarreporter1: CJ XI
Non playing Captain Chief Justice
On field captain
M M Sundaresh
Vineeth Kothari
Saravanan
Govindharaj
Anand Venkatesh
Abdul quodose
Ilanthirayan
Dhandapani
Jayachandran
Sathish
[1/25, 07:45] sekarreporter1: AG XI
Non playing captain Advocate General Vijay Narayanan
On field captain
Ramesh
ARL Sundaresan
Om Prakash
Sozhendran
Suresh
Venkatesan
Arvind Subramanian
Murali
Kanmani
Rajashekar
Balaji
Bhaskar
Sugumar
M S Krishnan
Vijay Anand
Karthik
Raguraman

You may also like...

once CCB case quashed ed no power to investigate MS Ramesh judge Sunder mohan judge order for company Ag p s Raman for ed AR L sundaresan argued

April 5, 2024

by Sekar Reporter · Published April 5, 2024
[10/3, 20:32] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1709222194285609179?t=AteUYXdUjyhOBdU084C5GQ&s=08 [10/3, 20:32] sekarreporter1: ரூ.10 கோடி மானநஷ்ட ஈடு கேட்டு ஏ.ஆர்.ரகுமான் பிரமல பெண் வக்கீல் நர்மதா சம்பத் நோட்டீஸ்! இசையமைப்பாளர் ஏ.ஆர்.ரகுமான் புகழுக்கு களங்கம் விளைவிக்கும் வகையில் புகார்! 2018 ஆண்டு இசை நிகழ்ச்சி நடத்துவதாக கூறி ரூ.29 லட்சம் பெற்றுக்கொண்டு ஏமாற்றியதாக அறுவை சிகிச்சை நிபுணர்கள் சங்கம் தெரிவித்தால்

October 3, 2023

by Sekar Reporter · Published October 3, 2023
N.KAVITHA RAMESHWAR ADVOCATE, MADRAS HIGH COURT WOMEN LOSE OUT AS STATES YET TO DELIVER ON PREGNANCY STATUTE Four cases: the first of a 25 week pregnancy with a foetal anomaly before the Bombay High Court, the next of a 28 week pregnancy with a foetal

January 19, 2022

by Sekar Reporter · Published January 19, 2022

Follow:

Next story [1/25, 09:03] advt Sagadevan: Judges fielding 1st [1/25, 09:08] sekarreporter1: 👍👍
Previous story [1/24, 18:53] sekarreporter1: [1/24, 18:24] Bar Council vice chairman Karthigayan: The Bar Council Chairman Mr.P.S.AMALRAJ,Vice Chairman Mr.V.Karthikeyan ,BCI Mr.S.Prabakaran ,Senior Advocate,and Mr.G.Mhoganakrishnan all are special Welcome to Mr.P.Wilson,Senior Advocate,and Mr.ARL SUNDARESAN,Senior Advocate, Also Today 24/01/2020 Arbitration and Conciliation act 1996 Books issued For District Judge Exams(Preliminary)all Students. @ Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Puducherry. [1/24, 18:33] sekarreporter1: 👍👍 [1/24, 19:36] sekarreporter1: On behalf of our TN Senior Advocates forum, I thank Mr *ARL Sundaresan * Senior Advocate who delivered lecture today (24.1.2020) between 4.30-6.30pm at Barcouncil Auditorium , Chennai on *The Arbitrationand concillation Act* Many thanks to him💐 P. Wilson Senior Advocate Convenor *NEETHI KARANGAL*

Search for:

Recent Posts

Today 6 law tips / [20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2015 (6) SCC 287 : Priyanka srivastava vs state of UP : when a borrower of financial institution covered under the SARFASI act , invokes jurisdiction under sec 156 (3) CRPC and also there is a separate procedure under Recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act , an attitude of more care , caution and circumspection has to be adhered to[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court judgement: SLP ( civil ) No 9496 of 2020 dated 4- 02 – 2022 Ajanta LLP vs casino keisanki kabushiki computer ltd : consent decree cannot be modified / altered unless the mistake is patent or obvious mistake ( order 23 rule 3 CPC 1908 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) SCC 39 ; Joseph shine vs union.of india : A bench disagreeing with decision.of a larger or coequal bench can only refer the matter to a larger bench , it cannot disagree or dissent[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court: civil.appeal no 363 of 2022 dated 10- 02 – 2022 Bank of baroda vs M / S karwa trading company and another : In a SARFASI proceedings , unless and until borrower ready to deposit / pay entire amount payable together with all costs and expenses with secured creditor , borrower cannot be discharged from entire liability outstanding[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 830 : saradhammal vs sankaralingam : Held transfer of immovable property under attachment with knowledge of attachment vitiates transfer ( sec 52 transfer of property act 1882 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2011 (7) SCC 69 : Amar singh vs union of india : Held litigants must observe total clarity and candour in their pleadings especially when it contains a prayer for injunction ( order 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1781564360177209576?t=ijXt2lW-UwiEB44RJHBZCg&s=08[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: K Parasaran book Launch function vadapalani chennai today evening 5.30 thanjai sastra college chennai campus
Juniors of Senior Govindaswinathan award function[20/04, 11:15] sekarreporter1: Juniors of late Senior adv Govindaswinathan award function held Sunday naradaganasaba 10.30 morning
PLAINT LIFELINE OF LITIGATION
DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC IS MAINTAINABLE FROM THE APPELLAT’S COURT DECREE OF REVERSING THE REJECTION OF PLAINT DECREE:-

More

Recent Posts

Today 6 law tips / [20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2015 (6) SCC 287 : Priyanka srivastava vs state of UP : when a borrower of financial institution covered under the SARFASI act , invokes jurisdiction under sec 156 (3) CRPC and also there is a separate procedure under Recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act , an attitude of more care , caution and circumspection has to be adhered to[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court judgement: SLP ( civil ) No 9496 of 2020 dated 4- 02 – 2022 Ajanta LLP vs casino keisanki kabushiki computer ltd : consent decree cannot be modified / altered unless the mistake is patent or obvious mistake ( order 23 rule 3 CPC 1908 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) SCC 39 ; Joseph shine vs union.of india : A bench disagreeing with decision.of a larger or coequal bench can only refer the matter to a larger bench , it cannot disagree or dissent[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court: civil.appeal no 363 of 2022 dated 10- 02 – 2022 Bank of baroda vs M / S karwa trading company and another : In a SARFASI proceedings , unless and until borrower ready to deposit / pay entire amount payable together with all costs and expenses with secured creditor , borrower cannot be discharged from entire liability outstanding[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 830 : saradhammal vs sankaralingam : Held transfer of immovable property under attachment with knowledge of attachment vitiates transfer ( sec 52 transfer of property act 1882 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2011 (7) SCC 69 : Amar singh vs union of india : Held litigants must observe total clarity and candour in their pleadings especially when it contains a prayer for injunction ( order 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1781564360177209576?t=ijXt2lW-UwiEB44RJHBZCg&s=08[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: K Parasaran book Launch function vadapalani chennai today evening 5.30 thanjai sastra college chennai campus
Juniors of Senior Govindaswinathan award function[20/04, 11:15] sekarreporter1: Juniors of late Senior adv Govindaswinathan award function held Sunday naradaganasaba 10.30 morning
PLAINT LIFELINE OF LITIGATION
DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC IS MAINTAINABLE FROM THE APPELLAT’S COURT DECREE OF REVERSING THE REJECTION OF PLAINT DECREE:-

SEKAR REPORTER © 2024. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by - Designed with the Hueman theme