You may also like...
-
Justice S.M.Subramaniam held that there is a failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment. It is categorically stated that the initiation of assessment years is to be taken as AY 1996-97 and the assessee is eligible only for 30% payment of the deduction claim and the remaining 70% is to be taxed. Thus, the deduction under Section 80-IA should be restricted to Rs.26,18,90,989/- and an excess claim of Rs.61,10,78,973/- is to be disallowed. Thus, there is a definite ‘reason to believe that the deduction of Rs.61,10,78,973/- is an excess deduction to the tune of income chargeable to tax as an escaped assessment.
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 23, 2021
-
former judges mogan ram and akbar ali புதிய பதவி
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 1, 2023
-
Karuvelamaram case full bench full order THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH,J., AND M. SUNDAR,J., (Order of the Court was made by The Hon’ble The Chief Justice) We have heard Mr.Vaiko, in person and Mr.T. Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.No.10614 of 2017 and have perused the Report dated 09.10.2017 submitted by the Experts Committee constituted under the orders of this Court. Sri.T. Mohan, learned counsel submits that there is an inconsistency in the Expert Committee’s report and for that, he invites the attention of this Court to page no.8 of the Report, where, there is a recital that one of the most observed negative impacts is its effect on ecology of water channels and water bodies. The dense growth of the species in these critical ecosystems has impeded the water flow and has reduced the water holding capacity in some cases. The siltation
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 20, 2020