You may also like...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) W.M.P.No. of 2021 IN W.P.No. 13384 of 2021 Suba.Veerapandian advocate arul.moli mam –I submit that the speculation of an interested party to a litigation cannot create a ground for Public Interest Litigation. The fact that there is a large number of students in rural areas and sub-urban localities who are not opting for Science Groups in Higher Secondary Level and the number of students dropping out without writing NEET exam after filing applications are also a matter for concern of the state. Further, the lower middle class children especially the women students are not enjoying the luxury of staying at home for 2 or 3 years to make consecutive attempts to write the NEET and secure admission. These adversities are not limited to the points mentioned above alone. Even assuming that state decides to submit a review application to reconsider the decision dated 29.04.2020 made in CMC, Vellore Vs Union Of India, the state needs a data collected by a competent Committee. Hence constituting a committee to examine effects of NEET cannot be considered as an effort to thwart the judgment of the Supreme Court.
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 5, 2021
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 26, 2020