TAMIL NADUVedanta made at least ₹20,000 cr. in 20 years: TNPCB by Sekar Reporter · January 8, 2020 NADUTAMIL NADUVedanta made at least ₹20,000 cr. in 20 years: TNPCBMohamed Imranullah S.CHENNAI 08 JANUARY 2020 01:32 ISTUPDATED: 08 JANUARY 2020 01:32 IST ‘Company cannot say it is suffering because of closure of Sterlite plant’The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) on Tuesday vehemently defended the decision to permanently close down the Sterlite copper smelting plant in Thoothukudi and claimed that its owners, Vedanta Limited, would have earned at least than ₹20,000 crore ever since the plant was commissioned in 1997.Arguing before a Bench of Justices T.S. Sivagnanam and V. Bhavani Subbaroyan, senior counsel C.S. Vaidyanathan decried the repeated assertion made on behalf of Vedanta that it had invested around ₹3,000 crore on the copper plant and that the State government could not shut it down abruptly citing environmental concerns.Referring to one of the affidavits filed by the company claiming to be losing ₹5 crore a day ever since the plant was closed down permanently in May 2018, the senior counsel, who had commenced arguing the matter for the TNPCB after advocates T. Mohan and A. Yogeshwaran completed their arguments on behalf of anti-Sterlite activists, said even going by its own submission, the company would have earned at least ₹1,500 crore every year.AdvertisingAdvertising“In the last 20 years since the operations began, they would have made at least ₹20,000 crore. After having made such huge profits, they cannot cry hoarse today that they are suffering because of closure. On the other hand, the damage caused to the environment by the plant is much greater,” the senior counsel said.Assisted by TNPCB standing counsel Abdul Saleem, Mr. Vaidyanathan said, “It has been proven conclusively through scientific evidence that no amount of remedial measures taken by them (Vedanta) will improve the water quality in the locality. The only way to save the environment is to close down the unit.
தத்து கொடுக்கப்பட்ட சிறுமியை திரும்ப கேட்டு பெற்ற தாய் தொடர்ந்த வழக்கில், வளர்ப்பு தாயிடமே சிறுமியை ஒப்படைக்கவேண்டும் November 28, 2021 by Sekar Reporter · Published November 28, 2021
1 ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.15 SECTION II-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 6609/2022 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18-07-2022 in WP No. 18455/2022 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Madras) RAMALIGNAM Petitioner(s) July 22, 2022 by Sekar Reporter · Published July 22, 2022
Sekarreporter1: C.M.A.No.1971 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27-01-2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM CMA No.1971 of 2016 R.M.Selvam .. Appellant vs. 1.D.Murali 2.Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd February 2, 2021 by Sekar Reporter · Published February 2, 2021