Susi Ganeshan preferred a Writ Appeal against the common judgment passed by the High Court in W.P No. 20411 of 2021 and Crl O.P No. 20337 of 2021 and it came before the ACJ bench for seeking leave to prefer the Writ Appeal and the High Court today dismissed the leave petition as the appellant have already approached the Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (crl) No. 986
[2/9, 12:52] Sekarreporter 1: Susi Ganeshan preferred a Writ Appeal against the common judgment passed by the High Court in W.P No. 20411 of 2021 and Crl O.P No. 20337 of 2021 and it came before the ACJ bench for seeking leave to prefer the Writ Appeal and the High Court today dismissed the leave petition as the appellant have already approached the Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (crl) No. 9863 of 2021 and the Apex Court by an order dated 17.12.2021 was pleased pass an order stating that the appearance of the respondent before the trial Court in not necessary for all hearings, she could be represented by a counsel and if the trial Court feels that the presence of the respondent is required summons/notice shall be issued to the respondent with reasonable time notice and in the event the presence of respondent does not appear necessary steps may be taken in accordance with law, Taking note of the said order of the Apex Court the High Court was pleased to dismiss the leave petition and consequently the Writ Appeal is also dismissed.
[2/9, 12:52] Sekarreporter 1: A.Kripakaran Abudu’ Office
[2/9, 12:52] Sekarreporter 1: Susi Ganeshan preferred a Writ Appeal against the common judgment passed by the High Court in W.P No. 20411 of 2021 and Crl O.P No. 20337 of 2021 and it came before the ACJ bench for seeking leave to prefer the Writ Appeal and the High Court today dismissed the leave petition as the appellant have already approached the Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (crl) No. 9863 of 2021 and the Apex Court by an order dated 17.12.2021 was pleased pass an order stating that the appearance of the respondent before the trial Court in not necessary for all hearings, she could be represented by a counsel and if the trial Court feels that the presence of the respondent is required summons/notice shall be issued to the respondent with reasonable time notice and in the event the presence of respondent does not appear necessary steps may be taken in accordance with law, Taking note of the said order of the Apex Court the High Court was pleased to dismiss the leave petition and consequently the Writ Appeal is also dismissed.
[2/9, 12:52] Sekarreporter 1: A.Kripakaran Abudu’ Office
[2/9, 12:52] Sekarreporter 1: Susi Ganeshan preferred a Writ Appeal against the common judgment passed by the High Court in W.P No. 20411 of 2021 and Crl O.P No. 20337 of 2021 and it came before the ACJ bench for seeking leave to prefer the Writ Appeal and the High Court today dismissed the leave petition as the appellant have already approached the Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (crl) No. 9863 of 2021 and the Apex Court by an order dated 17.12.2021 was pleased pass an order stating that the appearance of the respondent before the trial Court in not necessary for all hearings, she could be represented by a counsel and if the trial Court feels that the presence of the respondent is required summons/notice shall be issued to the respondent with reasonable time notice and in the event the presence of respondent does not appear necessary steps may be taken in accordance with law, Taking note of the said order of the Apex Court the High Court was pleased to dismiss the leave petition and consequently the Writ Appeal is also dismissed.
[2/9, 12:52] Sekarreporter 1: A.Kripakaran Abudu’ Office
[2/9, 12:52] Sekarreporter 1: Susi Ganeshan preferred a Writ Appeal against the common judgment passed by the High Court in W.P No. 20411 of 2021 and Crl O.P No. 20337 of 2021 and it came before the ACJ bench for seeking leave to prefer the Writ Appeal and the High Court today dismissed the leave petition as the appellant have already approached the Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (crl) No. 9863 of 2021 and the Apex Court by an order dated 17.12.2021 was pleased pass an order stating that the appearance of the respondent before the trial Court in not necessary for all hearings, she could be represented by a counsel and if the trial Court feels that the presence of the respondent is required summons/notice shall be issued to the respondent with reasonable time notice and in the event the presence of respondent does not appear necessary steps may be taken in accordance with law, Taking note of the said order of the Apex Court the High Court was pleased to dismiss the leave petition and consequently the Writ Appeal is also dismissed.
[2/9, 12:52] Sekarreporter 1: A.Kripakaran Abudu’ Office
Susi Ganeshan preferred a Writ Appeal against the common judgment passed by the High Court in W.P No. 20411 of 2021 and Crl O.P No. 20337 of 2021 and it came before the ACJ bench for seeking leave to prefer the Writ Appeal and the High Court today dismissed the leave petition as the appellant have already approached the Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (crl) No. 986
[2/9, 12:52] Sekarreporter 1: Susi Ganeshan preferred a Writ Appeal against the common judgment passed by the High Court in W.P No. 20411 of 2021 and Crl O.P No. 20337 of 2021 and it came before the ACJ bench for seeking leave to prefer the Writ Appeal and the High Court today dismissed the leave petition as the appellant have already approached the Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (crl) No. 9863 of 2021 and the Apex Court by an order dated 17.12.2021 was pleased pass an order stating that the appearance of the respondent before the trial Court in not necessary for all hearings, she could be represented by a counsel and if the trial Court feels that the presence of the respondent is required summons/notice shall be issued to the respondent with reasonable time notice and in the event the presence of respondent does not appear necessary steps may be taken in accordance with law, Taking note of the said order of the Apex Court the High Court was pleased to dismiss the leave petition and consequently the Writ Appeal is also dismissed.
[2/9, 12:52] Sekarreporter 1: A.Kripakaran Abudu’ Office
[2/9, 12:52] Sekarreporter 1: Susi Ganeshan preferred a Writ Appeal against the common judgment passed by the High Court in W.P No. 20411 of 2021 and Crl O.P No. 20337 of 2021 and it came before the ACJ bench for seeking leave to prefer the Writ Appeal and the High Court today dismissed the leave petition as the appellant have already approached the Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (crl) No. 9863 of 2021 and the Apex Court by an order dated 17.12.2021 was pleased pass an order stating that the appearance of the respondent before the trial Court in not necessary for all hearings, she could be represented by a counsel and if the trial Court feels that the presence of the respondent is required summons/notice shall be issued to the respondent with reasonable time notice and in the event the presence of respondent does not appear necessary steps may be taken in accordance with law, Taking note of the said order of the Apex Court the High Court was pleased to dismiss the leave petition and consequently the Writ Appeal is also dismissed.
[2/9, 12:52] Sekarreporter 1: A.Kripakaran Abudu’ Office
Susi Ganeshan preferred a Writ Appeal against the common judgment passed by the High Court in W.P No. 20411 of 2021 and Crl O.P No. 20337 of 2021 and it came before the ACJ bench for seeking leave to prefer the Writ Appeal and the High Court today dismissed the leave petition as the appellant have already approached the Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (crl) No. 986
Susi Ganeshan preferred a Writ Appeal against the common judgment passed by the High Court in W.P No. 20411 of 2021 and Crl O.P No. 20337 of 2021 and it came before the ACJ bench for seeking leave to prefer the Writ Appeal and the High Court today dismissed the leave petition as the appellant have already approached the Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (crl) No. 986
Susi Ganeshan preferred a Writ Appeal against the common judgment passed by the High Court in W.P No. 20411 of 2021 and Crl O.P No. 20337 of 2021 and it came before the ACJ bench for seeking leave to prefer the Writ Appeal and the High Court today dismissed the leave petition as the appellant have already approached the Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (crl) No. 986
Susi Ganeshan preferred a Writ Appeal against the common judgment passed by the High Court in W.P No. 20411 of 2021 and Crl O.P No. 20337 of 2021 and it came before the ACJ bench for seeking leave to prefer the Writ Appeal and the High Court today dismissed the leave petition as the appellant have already approached the Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (crl) No. 986
Susi Ganeshan preferred a Writ Appeal against the common judgment passed by the High Court in W.P No. 20411 of 2021 and Crl O.P No. 20337 of 2021 and it came before the ACJ bench for seeking leave to prefer the Writ Appeal and the High Court today dismissed the leave petition as the appellant have already approached the Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (crl) No. 986
![Ag son மனு sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1654341021088743424?t=lUnqBzHKqaOwBu-VB9ExhQ&s=08 [5/5, 09:54] sekarreporter1: The importance of constitutional punctuality PREMIUM Constitutional high offices must evolve guidelines to discharge their duties in a time-bound manner, safeguarding the will of the people](http://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)