Follow:
- Next story Full news THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.(MD)No.2660 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 (Through Video Conference) Tmt.R.Rajathi – On the question whether the land once vested in the Government could be divested, the Supreme Court held in para 26 of the report in V. Chandrasekaran v.Administrative Officer [2012-5-L.W. 724; (2012) 12 SCC 133], that a land once acquired cannot be restored to the owners, even if it is not used for the purpose for which it was acquired or for any other purpose either. 123. Therefore, it is clear that the original land owners do not acquire a right merely because the acquired land is not used for the purpose for which it was acquired or for any other purpose either. This is the general rule. The exception to this rule is in Section 48-B. But this exception also, as we have pointed out earlier, does not apply to all types of cases where the acquired land is not used for the purpose for which it was acquired or for any other purpose. The exception under Section 48-B applies only to cases where the acquired land is not at all required either for the purpose for which it was acquired or for any other purpose.” 27. In view of the above discussion, this Court does not find any legal right for the petitioner to seek for reconveyance of the land, more particularly, when the State has already initiated steps to use the lands for public purpose for issuing ‘House Site Patta’ to persons belonging to Backward Community (B.C) and Most Backward Community (M.B.C.) and hence, this Court cannot issue a Mandamus and accordingly, the present Writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
- Previous story [7/12, 08:20] Sekarreporter: https://youtu.be/f-ghPej_BNc [7/12, 08:20] Sekarreporter: [7/12, 08:17] Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: *சந்துரு சட்ட பயிற்சிப் பட்டறை*இணையதள கல்வி* *நீதித்துறை தேர்வாளர்கள்/ வழக்கறிஞர்கள்/ சட்ட மாணவர்கள்* பாடம்: *இ.த.ச. 1860* *தலைப்பு*அத்தியாயம்XVI* *நாள்*: 12 /7/ 2021 *நேரம்*: *6:45 PM to 8:30PM* தொடர்பு: 7339650446 [7/12, 08:17] Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: *CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* inviting you to *Online coaching* for *APP/JUDICIAL EXAMINATION/MAGISTRATE* *SUBJECT* : *IPC,1860* *TITLE* – *CHAPTER XV* *CHAPTER XVI*,(continuation) Date: 12/7/ 2021 TIMING: 💥 6:45-8:30pm Contact:7339650446 [7/12, 08:17] Sekarreporter: 💐
Recent Posts
- s M subramaniyam judge order/ In view of the fact that the petitioners have admittedly signed the bond and accepted the terms and conditions stipulated therein, they are not entitled to claim any concession for further reduction of period stipulated under the bond conditions. Therefore, the petitioners have to serve in Government Medical College and Hospitals as per the appointment order in compliance with the conditions and after completion of the period stipulated, appropriate decision may be taken by the respondents.
- TN govt informs #MadrasHighCourt the TN Heritage Commission (Amendment) Act, 2017 has been notified on March 1, 2024 and has come into effect from then on; the submission was made before first bench led by CJ SV Gangapurwala when a PIL on the matter came up for hearing @xpresstn
- In the W.P No 11463 of 2024 . The Writ Petition was Allowed in the favour of Petitioner
- [26/04, 12:21] sekarreporter1: Petitioner Name: A. Sathya Prakash Advocate.
- [26/04, 12:14] sekarreporter1: #JUSTIN || பிரதமர் மோடிக்கு எதிராக வழக்கு – 29ம் தேதிக்கு தள்ளிவைப்பு
More
Recent Posts
- s M subramaniyam judge order/ In view of the fact that the petitioners have admittedly signed the bond and accepted the terms and conditions stipulated therein, they are not entitled to claim any concession for further reduction of period stipulated under the bond conditions. Therefore, the petitioners have to serve in Government Medical College and Hospitals as per the appointment order in compliance with the conditions and after completion of the period stipulated, appropriate decision may be taken by the respondents.
- TN govt informs #MadrasHighCourt the TN Heritage Commission (Amendment) Act, 2017 has been notified on March 1, 2024 and has come into effect from then on; the submission was made before first bench led by CJ SV Gangapurwala when a PIL on the matter came up for hearing @xpresstn
- In the W.P No 11463 of 2024 . The Writ Petition was Allowed in the favour of Petitioner
- [26/04, 12:21] sekarreporter1: Petitioner Name: A. Sathya Prakash Advocate.
- [26/04, 12:14] sekarreporter1: #JUSTIN || பிரதமர் மோடிக்கு எதிராக வழக்கு – 29ம் தேதிக்கு தள்ளிவைப்பு