Follow:
- Next story Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2021/02/28/2-27-2214-k-selvaraj-mhc-advt-28-02-2021-k-selvaraj-mhc-adv-pearls-of-wisdom-life-i-have-found-is-neither-roses-nor-thorns-it-is-as-i-said-earlier-a-mixed-fare-it-has-its-moment/ [2/28, 06:58] Sekarreporter1: [2/27, 22:14] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: 28.02.2021: K.
- Previous story Lordship s vaithiyanathan -W.P.No.4607 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.5246 of 2021 (Heard through VC) Prof.M.K.Surappa Vice-Chancellor Anna University. -Taking note of the submission and assurance of the learned Advocate General that no final decision will be taken on the report, there shall be a direction to the Government not to give effect to the report of the Enquiry Commission till 05.04.2021.
Recent Posts
- Today, the Writ Appeals filed by the State challenging an order of the High Court quashing G.O. 721 which was issued by the AIADMK government to hand over files of the Regupathy Commission of Inquiry to the DVAC were permitted to be withdrawn by a Hon’ble Division Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. Suresh Kumar & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kumaresh Babu.
- 28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: AIR 1971 SC 803 : surla vs state of haryana : supreme court will not interfere with sentence of punishment unless it is established that the sentence is harsh or unjust in the facts and circumstances of the case[28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: 2004 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 855 SC : maulavi hussain haji abraham.umarji vs state of gujarat : while interpreting a provision the court only interprets the law and cannot legislate it
- உதவி ஆணையராக இருந்த வெள்ளதுரை உள்ளிட்டோருக்கு மாநில மனித உரிமை ஆணையம் அபராதம் விதித்து பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை ரத்து
- Justice M Dhandapani of the Madurai bench made the observation in a plea seeking to quash the FIR registered against a group of men who were demonstrating against the police inaction in a matter of the death of one Silambarasan due to police brutality.
- Justice N. Anand Venkatesh has summoned three advocates, an Inspector of Police and a property purchaser to the court on Thursday following a complaint that they broke upon the lock of a residential house and took forcible possession of the property.
More
Recent Posts
- Today, the Writ Appeals filed by the State challenging an order of the High Court quashing G.O. 721 which was issued by the AIADMK government to hand over files of the Regupathy Commission of Inquiry to the DVAC were permitted to be withdrawn by a Hon’ble Division Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. Suresh Kumar & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kumaresh Babu.
- 28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: AIR 1971 SC 803 : surla vs state of haryana : supreme court will not interfere with sentence of punishment unless it is established that the sentence is harsh or unjust in the facts and circumstances of the case[28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: 2004 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 855 SC : maulavi hussain haji abraham.umarji vs state of gujarat : while interpreting a provision the court only interprets the law and cannot legislate it
- உதவி ஆணையராக இருந்த வெள்ளதுரை உள்ளிட்டோருக்கு மாநில மனித உரிமை ஆணையம் அபராதம் விதித்து பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை ரத்து
- Justice M Dhandapani of the Madurai bench made the observation in a plea seeking to quash the FIR registered against a group of men who were demonstrating against the police inaction in a matter of the death of one Silambarasan due to police brutality.
- Justice N. Anand Venkatesh has summoned three advocates, an Inspector of Police and a property purchaser to the court on Thursday following a complaint that they broke upon the lock of a residential house and took forcible possession of the property.