You may also like...
-
Speaking to TNIE, senior advocate Geetha Ramaseshan calls this an important judgment. “Justice (retd) Prabha Sridevan had delivered a similar judgement before,” she says. The judgement had stated that the economic value of the unpaid domestic work of women should be taken into account under the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) treaty which India ratified in July 1993.
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 4, 2020
-
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD O.S.A. No. 142 of 2022 & C.M.P. No. 8712 of 2022 C. Shamilakumari ..Appellant Vs. P. Chandrasekar ..Respondent Prayer: Original Side Appeal under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of O.S. Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act to set aside the order and decretal order dated 08.04.2022 in O.P. No. 632 of 2022. For Appellant :: Mr.A.D. Janarthanan For Respondent :: Mr.G.V. Sridharan J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M. SUBRAMANIAM,J.) The Original Side Appeal has been instituted challenging the order and decretal order
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 27, 2022
-