Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1363801615950471168?s=08 [2/22, 16:14] Sekarreporter1: Today 22.02.2021 – R S Bharathi’s SC ST Act case came up before Hon’ble Justice N.Sathish Kumar – Quash petition filed by R.S.Bharathi
[2/22, 16:14] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1363801615950471168?s=08
[2/22, 16:14] Sekarreporter1: Today 22.02.2021 – R S Bharathi’s SC ST Act case came up before Hon’ble Justice N.Sathish Kumar – Quash petition filed by R.S.Bharathi
State Public Prosecutor Mr.A.Natarajan on behalf of the State , Mr.Shanmuga Sundaram senior advocate on behalf of the accused Mr.R S Bharathi and Mr.Ragavachari for Defacto complainant.
State PP Mr.A.Natarajan had vehemently opposed the Quash Petition filed by Mr.RS.Bharathi. The words spoken by RS.Bharathi reagrding Hon’ble Retired Justice Varadharajan affected society at large and the state has filed a detailed counter for the same.
After hearing arguments from all, Orders are reserved in the Quash petition.
![[21/03, 11:30] Mohanakrishnan President Mhaa: I moved a miscellaneous petition in CMP No.18729/2023 in CMA No. 1914/2021 challenging the maintainability of CMA against the Order granting interim maintenance passed by the Hon’ble Family Court, taking the stand that the Appellant is entitled to challenge the order only by way of filing CRP. Upon hearing the arguments, on 21.03.2024, the Hon’ble bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice Mr. M.SUNDAR, and Hon’ble Justice Mr. K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, has arrived at their decision that interim maintenace order passed by the Hon’ble family court shall be challenged only by way of a Civil Revision petition Article 227, which will be heard by a single judge, and not by way of a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.-G.MOHANAKRISHNAN,President, MHAA[21/03, 11:31] sekarreporter1: 👍](http://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
