Sc Landmark order govt servant case அரசு ஊழியர் பதவி உயர்வு மார்க் அடிப்படையில் வழங்க வேண்டும்

[10/2, 07:24] Sekarreporter.: https://youtu.be/WuWcgJMRDPE
[10/2, 07:25] Sekarreporter.: 1
ITEM NO.1501 Court 5 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
CONMT.PET.(C) No.638/2017 In C.A. No.4954/2016
V. SENTHUR & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
M. VIJAYAKUMAR, IAS, SECRETARY TAMIL NADU PUBLIC
SERVICE COMMISSION AND ANR. Respondent(s)
WITH
Diary No(s). 16048/2020 (XII)
CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1247/2019 in SLP(C) No. 2886/2016 (XII)
CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1848/2018 in SLP(C) No. 2886/2016 (XII)
CONMT.PET.(C) No. 2188/2018 in SLP(C) No. 2886/2016 (XII)
Diary No(s). 6415/2021 (XII)
SLP(C) No. 12114-12117/2021 (XII)
CONMT.PET.(C) No. 687/2021 in SLP(C) No. 2890-2894/2016 (XII)
Date : 01-10-2021 These matters were called on for pronouncement of
Order today.
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nithin Saravanan, Adv.
Ms. Arunima Singh, Adv.
Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, AOR
Ms. Priyadarshini, Adv.
Ms. Ridhima Malhotra, Adv.
Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv
Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, AOR
Mr. N. Subramaniyan, Adv
Mr. Jatin Bhardwaj, Adv
Ms. Shantha D. Raman, Adv
Mr. Garvesh Kabra, AOR
Mr. Ansar, Adv
Mr. Arihant Jain, Adv
Mr. N. Subramaniyan, Adv
Ms. Neha Rathi, AOR
[10/2, 07:25] Sekarreporter.: 3
1) K. Shanmugam
2) K. Nanthakumar
3) Dr. K.Manivasan
4) K. Ramamurthy
C.P.(C)No.1848 of 2018 and C.P.(C)No.2188 of 2018 in SLP
(C)No.2886 of 2016:
1) K. Nanthakumar
2) S. K. Prabhakar
3) S. Bakthavathchalam”
We, therefore, direct the respondents to revise
and publish the seniority list of the selectees, who were
selected in the selection process conducted in pursuance
of the notification issued by TNPSC dated 10th September
1999, strictly on the basis of the merit determined by it
in the selection process and not on the basis of the
roster point. The same shall be done within a period of 12
weeks from the date of this order.
Insofar as the issue with regard to quantum of
punishment to be imposed upon the aforesaid contemnors is
concerned, the matter be kept on 10th January 2022. We
clarify that on the said date, the persons named in
paragraph (25) who have been held guilty of contempt of
this Court by us, shall remain present before this Court
and would be heard on the quantum of punishment.
Insofar as SLP(C) Nos.12114-12117 of 2021 are
concerned, in view of the order passed by us in the
contempt petitions, no order is necessary. Accordingly,
the said Special Leave Petitions are disposed of.

 

 

 

 

 

You may also like...