You may also like...
-
The Madras High Court has quashed an FIR registered against a person accused of protesting in the public road against the implementation of the Citizenship Amendment Act,2019 without getting prior permission from the concerned authority.–Perusing the files, Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyannoted that the First Information Report has been registered by the police for the offences under Sections 143 and 188 IPC. The court also added that in Jeevanandham and others Vs. State, it was held that a Police Officer cannot register an FIR for any of the offences falling under Section 172 to 188 of IPC. The bench, while quashing the FIR, said:
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 5, 2020
-
https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1723570796696855006?t=djzoGqAOPZwNA0IfIaKhVw&s=08 gratuity case allowed full order Therefore, taking a wholistic view of the 1977 Regulations, 1979 Regulations, Circular dated 16.01.1997 and the facts on record, we are of the view that the present civil appeal deserves to be allowed. We affirm the findings of the learned Single Judge and setaside the judgement rendered by the Division Bench. The appeal is allowed. No order as to costs. ……………………………….J. (J.K. MAHESHWARI) ………………………………J. (K.V. VISWANATHAN) NEW DELHI; NOVEMBER 06, 2023.
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 12, 2023
-
HC questions commencement of Class XI admissions mmsj bench sgp munusamy seek time to file counter
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 22, 2020