You may also like...
-
Judge v parthiban j .In the result, both the Second Appeals stand dismissed. The Substantial Questions of Law framed in both the Second Appeals are answered against the appellants. The appellants herein are directed to handover the vacant possession of the suit schedule property to the respondent Charity within two months
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 24, 2020
-
Criminal prosecution against husband, his parents and relatives after the Family Court dissolved the marriage can be taken note of by the Court to conclude that wife intended to harass and humiliate not only the respondent but also his family judges subbya j and c saravananj
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 27, 2020
-
Court raps Manipur government on zero utilisation of Nirbhaya Fund for women’s safety While hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by RK Joysana, chief justice Ramalingam Sudhakar and justice MV Muralidaran observed that it was “disturbing” to note that there is “zero utilisation” of the Rs 446.53 lakh released for Emergency Response Supports System under Nirbhaya Fund.While hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by RK Joysana, chief justice Ramalingam Sudhakar and justice MV Muralidaran observed that it was “disturbing” to note that there is “zero utilisation” of the Rs 446.53 lakh released for Emergency Response Supports System under Nirbhaya Fund.While hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by RK Joysana, chief justice Ramalingam Sudhakar and justice MV Muralidaran observed that it was “disturbing” to note that there is “zero utilisation” of the Rs 446.53 lakh released for Emergency Response Supports System under Nirbhaya Fund.
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 8, 2019