You may also like...
-
Contempt Petition No.683 of 2019 in W.P.No.31213 of 2017 S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. and P.T.ASHA,J. On 01.11.2022, this Court had directed the learned Advocate General representing the Contemnor to clarify the contents. It is also clarified that the Nurses need not be necessarily called separately for personal enquiry, but each case shall be considered individually on the basis of the letters, documents and comparative chart that each of the individual Nurses would submit with reference to the orders of this Court dated 11.06.2018 and 02.07.2018, respectively. In the light of the above order, Associations shall not be addressed and they need not be given an audience. 7. List this matter on 04.01.2023. (S.V.N.,J.) (P.T.A.,J.) 21.11.2022
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 29, 2022
-
-
[12/28, 07:51] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1210747430460805121?s=08 [12/28, 07:51] Sekarreporter 1: [12/28, 07:48] Sekarreporter 1: [12/28, 07:46] V subramani Advt: Thanks sekar..i won this case.. [12/28, 07:47] Sekarreporter 1: 👍 [12/28, 07:50] Sekarreporter 1: : No Copyright in Title of Film HC observation That the American Courts have taken a view that the title alone of a literary work cannot be protected under the Act. Copying of title alone, and not the plot, songs, dialogue etc. is not the subject of copyright law. https://sekarreporter.com/no-copyright-in-title-of-film-hc-observation-that-the-american-courts-have-taken-a-view-that-the-title-alone-of-a-literary-work-cannot-be-protected-under-the-act-copying-of-title-alone-and-not-the/
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 28, 2019