Skip to content

Primary Menu

Home
Gallery
Contact Us

Search for:

Home
Uncategorized
Ph pandian senior advt passed away https://youtu.be/p0TwpHqtO8o

Uncategorized

Ph pandian senior advt passed away https://youtu.be/p0TwpHqtO8o

By Sekar Reporter 1 year ago

Continue Reading

Previous நாளை மாலை கீழ்பாக்கத்தில்அவரது உடல் அடக்கம் செய்யப்படவுள்ளது..

Next Avudayappan Senior Reporter Dinamalar: மிகப் பெரிய ஆளுமை. துணிச்சல். கணீர், கம்பீரமான குரல். எங்கே பார்த்தாலும், ஒரு புன்னகை. சமீபத்தில் சேரன்மாதேவி வீட்டுக்கு சென்ற போது, அன்னாரது பன்முகங்களை புகைப்படங்களில் பார்த்தேன். அவரது இழப்பு பேரிழப்பு. அரவிந்த், மனோஜ்க்கு ஆழ்ந்த இரங்கல https://t.co/VtTHPIk1Hk

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

Search for:

Recent Posts

Justice V Parthiban said a writ court is not a proper forum to settle a dispute of this nature involving interpretation of contractual terms and agreement and adjudication of the rival claims. MKU had in 2014 entered into an agreement with Coimbatore-based Set Infotect Pvt Ltd for creation of an e-learning portal and development of digital content for the directorate of distance education. On completion of the project stage-wise, the company forwarded the bills from time to time which were settled by the university.
Sekarreporter1: ☘️ [4/18, 21:50] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: *19.04.’21, LAW NOTES:* *7)* *Favouritism, Malice or
Sekarreporter1: ☘️ [4/18, 21:50] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: *19.04.’21, LAW NOTES:* *7)* *Favouritism, Malice or Malafide*
Justices T S Sivagnanam and S Ananthi said they do not agree with the submissions of petitioner Muthukaruppan’s counsel that the petition was filed by his client in his private capacity and he has every right to withdraw it.
Justice Anitha Sumanth said that the tabulation of payments, in this case, is joint, the petitioner offering a sum of Rupees Seven Crores (since retracted) and the Officer to ascertain the balance. This exercise has not been carried out and, with this, the requirement of ‘ascertainment’ under Section 74(5), fails

Recent Posts

Justice V Parthiban said a writ court is not a proper forum to settle a dispute of this nature involving interpretation of contractual terms and agreement and adjudication of the rival claims. MKU had in 2014 entered into an agreement with Coimbatore-based Set Infotect Pvt Ltd for creation of an e-learning portal and development of digital content for the directorate of distance education. On completion of the project stage-wise, the company forwarded the bills from time to time which were settled by the university.
Sekarreporter1: ☘️ [4/18, 21:50] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: *19.04.’21, LAW NOTES:* *7)* *Favouritism, Malice or
Sekarreporter1: ☘️ [4/18, 21:50] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: *19.04.’21, LAW NOTES:* *7)* *Favouritism, Malice or Malafide*
Justices T S Sivagnanam and S Ananthi said they do not agree with the submissions of petitioner Muthukaruppan’s counsel that the petition was filed by his client in his private capacity and he has every right to withdraw it.
Justice Anitha Sumanth said that the tabulation of payments, in this case, is joint, the petitioner offering a sum of Rupees Seven Crores (since retracted) and the Officer to ascertain the balance. This exercise has not been carried out and, with this, the requirement of ‘ascertainment’ under Section 74(5), fails

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Magazine 7 by AF themes.

CALL ME