Follow:
- Next story Mhc chief justice sha new year good speech in mba today
- Previous story Today mba new year photos
Recent Posts
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.327 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.19219 of 2022. Similarly, I find that the plaintiff is not entitled to the relief of permanent injunction and accordingly, the finding of the trial Court in respect of issue no.5 and 6 are also in order. J. The Result : 8. In the result : (i) A.S.No.327 of 2016 is dismissed; (ii) There shall be no order as to costs
- THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Appeal Suit No.248 of 2010 A/m.Pathala Ponniamman Temple, Attached to Arulmighu Gangadareswarar Temple, Rep.by its Executive Officer, No.131, Gangadareswarar Koil Street, Purasawalkam, Chennai -84. … Appellant In that view of the matter, I answer the question that the plaintiff is not entitled for the relief of vacant possession as well as a permanent injunction, in the present Appeal as filed by the plaintiff/Temple, not on merits but for the defect of not arraying the Manyadar as also a defendant in the suit for eviction.
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.R.P.Nos.206 and 208 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.1672 of 2023 C.R.P.No.206 of 2023 E.Suresh Kumar … Petitioner The Sub Court, Pollachi is directed to proceed with the case without causing any undue delay and dispose of the matrimonial proceedings as expeditiously as possible. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition in C.R.P.Nos.206 and 208 of 2023 stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
- [2/7, 14:27] sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1622881988838567936?t=5MosgO9uhafUIuNGShOo8A&s=08 [2/7, 14:27] sekarreporter1: The Advocate General of Tamil Nadu Mr. R. Shunmugasundaram turns digital a day after E-filing was launched @ the Madras High Court . Let’s hope the litigants slowly turn digital to have a paperless life and promote sustainability
- Mhc e filing inaguration
More
Recent Posts
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.327 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.19219 of 2022. Similarly, I find that the plaintiff is not entitled to the relief of permanent injunction and accordingly, the finding of the trial Court in respect of issue no.5 and 6 are also in order. J. The Result : 8. In the result : (i) A.S.No.327 of 2016 is dismissed; (ii) There shall be no order as to costs
- THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Appeal Suit No.248 of 2010 A/m.Pathala Ponniamman Temple, Attached to Arulmighu Gangadareswarar Temple, Rep.by its Executive Officer, No.131, Gangadareswarar Koil Street, Purasawalkam, Chennai -84. … Appellant In that view of the matter, I answer the question that the plaintiff is not entitled for the relief of vacant possession as well as a permanent injunction, in the present Appeal as filed by the plaintiff/Temple, not on merits but for the defect of not arraying the Manyadar as also a defendant in the suit for eviction.
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.R.P.Nos.206 and 208 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.1672 of 2023 C.R.P.No.206 of 2023 E.Suresh Kumar … Petitioner The Sub Court, Pollachi is directed to proceed with the case without causing any undue delay and dispose of the matrimonial proceedings as expeditiously as possible. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition in C.R.P.Nos.206 and 208 of 2023 stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
- [2/7, 14:27] sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1622881988838567936?t=5MosgO9uhafUIuNGShOo8A&s=08 [2/7, 14:27] sekarreporter1: The Advocate General of Tamil Nadu Mr. R. Shunmugasundaram turns digital a day after E-filing was launched @ the Madras High Court . Let’s hope the litigants slowly turn digital to have a paperless life and promote sustainability
- Mhc e filing inaguration
