SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

ஆர்டர்லி முறையை ஒழிக்க தமிழக அரசு மற்றும் டிஜிப் எடுத்துள்ள நடவடிக்கைகள் வரவேற்கத்தகது என்று சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற நீதிபதி எஸ்.எம்.சுப்ரமணியம் பாராட்டு தெரிவித்துள்ளார். Aag kumaresan sgp s anitha harinath

Uncategorized

ஆர்டர்லி முறையை ஒழிக்க தமிழக அரசு மற்றும் டிஜிப் எடுத்துள்ள நடவடிக்கைகள் வரவேற்கத்தகது என்று சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற நீதிபதி எஸ்.எம்.சுப்ரமணியம் பாராட்டு தெரிவித்துள்ளார். Aag kumaresan sgp s anitha harinath

ஆர்டர்லி முறையை ஒழிக்க தமிழக அரசு மற்றும் டிஜிப் எடுத்துள்ள நடவடிக்கைகள் வரவேற்கத்தகது என்று சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற நீதிபதி எஸ்.எம்.சுப்ரமணியம் பாராட்டு தெரிவித்துள்ளார். ்துறையில் பணியாற்றும் யு.மாணிக்கவேல் என்பவர் வேறு இடத்திற்கு இடமாற்றம் செய்யப்பட்டதையடுத்து, காவலர் குடியிருப்பில் அவருக்கு ஒதுக்கப்பட்ட வீட்டை காலி செய்யும்படி 2014ம்...

ஆடர்லி நீதிபதிsms j  மீண்டும். சரமாரி கேள்ஙி [8/18, 10:54] Sekarreporter1: AAG kumaresan ssited by  special gp anitha says most of the orderlies have been taken back and that only essential orderlies are continuing until alternative arrangements are made. Says, deployment of five constables in the house of a police officer leads to Govt spending around Rs. 2.5 lakh per month.

Uncategorized

ஆடர்லி நீதிபதிsms j  மீண்டும். சரமாரி கேள்ஙி [8/18, 10:54] Sekarreporter1: AAG kumaresan ssited by  special gp anitha says most of the orderlies have been taken back and that only essential orderlies are continuing until alternative arrangements are made. Says, deployment of five constables in the house of a police officer leads to Govt spending around Rs. 2.5 lakh per month.

[8/18, 10:53] Sekarreporter1: ஆடர்லி நீதிபதிsms j  மீண்டும். சரமாரி கேள்ஙி [8/18, 10:54] Sekarreporter1: AAG kumaresan ssited by  special gp anitha says most of the orderlies have been taken back and that only essential orderlies are...

[8/18, 08:07] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/08/18/8-18-0806-chandrasekar-mhc-advt-chandru-law-academyinviting-you-to-offline-online-coaching-forjudicial-examination-magistrate-munsifsubject-the-indian-constitution-1950-continuationdate/ [8/18, 08:07] Sekarreporter1: [8/18, 08:06] Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: *CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* Inviting you to *OFFLINE / ONLINE coaching* for *JUDICIAL EXAMINATION/MAGISTRATE/ MUNSIF* *Subject: THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION, 1950* _(continuation)_ *Date : 18 AUGUST 2022* *Timing*: 10:45 am to 1:30 pm [8/18, 08:06] Sekarreporter1: 🌹

Uncategorized

[8/18, 08:07] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/08/18/8-18-0806-chandrasekar-mhc-advt-chandru-law-academyinviting-you-to-offline-online-coaching-forjudicial-examination-magistrate-munsifsubject-the-indian-constitution-1950-continuationdate/ [8/18, 08:07] Sekarreporter1: [8/18, 08:06] Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: *CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* Inviting you to *OFFLINE / ONLINE coaching* for *JUDICIAL EXAMINATION/MAGISTRATE/ MUNSIF* *Subject: THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION, 1950* _(continuation)_ *Date : 18 AUGUST 2022* *Timing*: 10:45 am to 1:30 pm [8/18, 08:06] Sekarreporter1: 🌹

[8/18, 08:07] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/08/18/8-18-0806-chandrasekar-mhc-advt-chandru-law-academyinviting-you-to-offline-online-coaching-forjudicial-examination-magistrate-munsifsubject-the-indian-constitution-1950-continuationdate/ [8/18, 08:07] Sekarreporter1: [8/18, 08:06] Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: *CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* Inviting you to *OFFLINE / ONLINE coaching* for *JUDICIAL EXAMINATION/MAGISTRATE/ MUNSIF* *Subject: THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION, 1950* _(continuation)_ *Date :...

 COMMON JUDGMENT D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARHY, J. The petitioner is an association registered under the Societies  Therefore, the present Writ Appeal and Writ Petitions are dismissed and we reiterate the earlier judgment in W.A.No.2895 of 2019, dated 28.08.2019. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, considering the fact that already in the earlier round, a sum of Rs.1,00,000/was imposed as costs, we refrain from imposing exemplary costs on the petitioner.  Consequently, C.M.P.No.2516 of 2022, W.M.P.Nos.12202 of 2021 and 3619 of 2021 are closed. (M.N.B., CJ)           (D.B.C., J.)                                                                     For  Appellant          : Mr.S.Selva Thirumurugan For Respondents : Mr.P.S.Raman, Senior Counsel   for Mr.Rahul Balaji, for R1 : M/s. Ramalingam & Associates, for R2 : Mrs.M.Sneha, for R3 In W.P.No.11467 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr.S.Selva Thirumurugan For Respondents : Mr.B.Rabu Manohar,   Central Government Senior Panel Counsel   for R1 : Mr.P.Muthukumar,   State Government Pleader for RR-4 and 8 : Ms.Shubharanjani Ananth,   Standing Counsel for RR-2 and 3

Uncategorized

 COMMON JUDGMENT D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARHY, J. The petitioner is an association registered under the Societies  Therefore, the present Writ Appeal and Writ Petitions are dismissed and we reiterate the earlier judgment in W.A.No.2895 of 2019, dated 28.08.2019. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, considering the fact that already in the earlier round, a sum of Rs.1,00,000/was imposed as costs, we refrain from imposing exemplary costs on the petitioner.  Consequently, C.M.P.No.2516 of 2022, W.M.P.Nos.12202 of 2021 and 3619 of 2021 are closed. (M.N.B., CJ)           (D.B.C., J.)                                                                     For  Appellant          : Mr.S.Selva Thirumurugan For Respondents : Mr.P.S.Raman, Senior Counsel   for Mr.Rahul Balaji, for R1 : M/s. Ramalingam & Associates, for R2 : Mrs.M.Sneha, for R3 In W.P.No.11467 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr.S.Selva Thirumurugan For Respondents : Mr.B.Rabu Manohar,   Central Government Senior Panel Counsel   for R1 : Mr.P.Muthukumar,   State Government Pleader for RR-4 and 8 : Ms.Shubharanjani Ananth,   Standing Counsel for RR-2 and 3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment reserved  on :  22.07.2022 Judgment delivered on :   16.08.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.A.No.324...

Therefore, We allow this Writ Appeal. We hold that the Writ Petition itself was not maintainable as there is an efficacious alternative remedy and also for non-joinder of necessary parties and therefore, stands dismissed, however, with liberty to the respondent herein to pursue the remedy of appeal, if it chooses to do so, in accordance with law. Consequently, C.M.P.No.11495 of 2022 is closed. (M.N.B., CJ)           (D.B.C., J.)                                                                                                                         16.08.2022  Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order grs Note: The original impugned order in one writ petition may be returned to the writ petitioner. THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARHY, J. grs W.A.No.1673 of 2022 16.08.2022. For  Appellants          : Mr.P.Muthukumar,   State Government Pleader   Assisted by Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan,   Government Advocate                                  For Respondent        : Mr.M.Palani JUDGMENT D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARHY, J.

Uncategorized

Therefore, We allow this Writ Appeal. We hold that the Writ Petition itself was not maintainable as there is an efficacious alternative remedy and also for non-joinder of necessary parties and therefore, stands dismissed, however, with liberty to the respondent herein to pursue the remedy of appeal, if it chooses to do so, in accordance with law. Consequently, C.M.P.No.11495 of 2022 is closed. (M.N.B., CJ)           (D.B.C., J.)                                                                                                                         16.08.2022  Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order grs Note: The original impugned order in one writ petition may be returned to the writ petitioner. THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARHY, J. grs W.A.No.1673 of 2022 16.08.2022. For  Appellants          : Mr.P.Muthukumar,   State Government Pleader   Assisted by Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan,   Government Advocate                                  For Respondent        : Mr.M.Palani JUDGMENT D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARHY, J.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment reserved  on :  04.08.2022 Judgment delivered on :  16.08.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.A.No.1673...

At this juncture, it is represented by M.Velmurugan, learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent submits that he withdraws his Vakalat and he is no more counsel for R3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor is directed to serve notice on Ramya / 3rd respondent to appear before this Court on the next date of hearing.                       List this matter on 18.08.2022 at 2.15pm. (S.V.N. J.,)       (A.D.J.C. J.,) 16.08.2022               tsh Note:  Registry is directed to mark a copy of this order to The Inspector General         of Registration, R.A.Puram, Chennai.

Uncategorized

At this juncture, it is represented by M.Velmurugan, learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent submits that he withdraws his Vakalat and he is no more counsel for R3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor is directed to serve notice on Ramya / 3rd respondent to appear before this Court on the next date of hearing.                       List this matter on 18.08.2022 at 2.15pm. (S.V.N. J.,)       (A.D.J.C. J.,) 16.08.2022               tsh Note:  Registry is directed to mark a copy of this order to The Inspector General         of Registration, R.A.Puram, Chennai.

HCP.No.728 of 2022     D.SHANTHI LATE W/O.DURAIRAJ, NO.19-A 11TH CROSS STREET, POOMBUGAR NAGAR, KOLATHUR, CHENNAI – 600 099. THE STATE REP BY ITS, THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, V-6 KOLATHUR POLICE STATION, KOLATHUR CHENNAI...

     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA H.C.P.No.580 of 2022 Selladurai                        Petitioner : M/s.G.Anabayachozhan For respondents : Mr.M.Babu Muthumeeran, Addl. Public Prosecutor for R1 & R2. Mr.V.Ramana Reddy for R3. Mr.R.Rajaramani for R4.                  

Uncategorized

     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA H.C.P.No.580 of 2022 Selladurai                        Petitioner : M/s.G.Anabayachozhan For respondents : Mr.M.Babu Muthumeeran, Addl. Public Prosecutor for R1 & R2. Mr.V.Ramana Reddy for R3. Mr.R.Rajaramani for R4.                  

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   DATED : 01.08.2022   Coram   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA   H.C.P.No.580 of 2022   Selladurai                                            .....