SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Hon’ble Minister for Electricity, Prohibition & Excise Thiru V. Senthil Balaji has filed a suit for defamation & injunction against Mr. CTR Nirmal Kumar, State Secretary of BJP IT Wing, TN.  Today the suit came up for admission before Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.V. Karthikeyan of the Madras High Court.  Mr. P. Wilson, Senior Advocate appeared for the Plaintiff and argued that the Defendant is habitually defaming the plaintiff by tweets on social media & interviews.

Hon’ble Minister for Electricity, Prohibition & Excise Thiru V. Senthil Balaji has filed a suit for defamation & injunction against Mr. CTR Nirmal Kumar, State Secretary of BJP IT Wing, TN. Today the suit came up for admission before Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.V. Karthikeyan of the Madras High Court. Mr. P. Wilson, Senior Advocate appeared for the Plaintiff and argued that the Defendant is habitually defaming the plaintiff by tweets on social media & interviews.

[11/17, 16:02] Sekarreporter 1: Hon’ble Minister for Electricity, Prohibition & Excise Thiru V. Senthil Balaji has filed a suit for defamation & injunction against Mr. CTR Nirmal Kumar, State Secretary of BJP IT Wing,...

[11/17, 16:06] Sekarreporter 1: [11/17, 16:05] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1593190925349838848?t=6HdUTvx1r6GeGjXWKCmNBA&s=08 [11/17, 16:05] Sekarreporter 1: [11/17, 15:25] Sekarreporter 1: ஜெ. மரணம் சிபிஐ விசாரணை கோரி ஆர.ஆர் கோபால் ஜி வழக்கு சிபிஐக்கு அரசுக்கு மனு கொடுத்துவிட்டு வரவும் என்று Mhc acj bench order [11/17, 15:25] Sekarreporter 1: .. [11/17, 16:09] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/GXPCeAJxcUk

[11/17, 16:06] Sekarreporter 1: [11/17, 16:05] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1593190925349838848?t=6HdUTvx1r6GeGjXWKCmNBA&s=08 [11/17, 16:05] Sekarreporter 1: [11/17, 15:25] Sekarreporter 1: ஜெ. மரணம் சிபிஐ விசாரணை கோரி ஆர.ஆர் கோபால் ஜி வழக்கு சிபிஐக்கு அரசுக்கு மனு கொடுத்துவிட்டு வரவும் என்று Mhc acj bench order [11/17, 15:25] Sekarreporter 1: .. [11/17, 16:09] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/GXPCeAJxcUk

[11/17, 16:06] Sekarreporter 1: [11/17, 16:05] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1593190925349838848?t=6HdUTvx1r6GeGjXWKCmNBA&s=08 [11/17, 16:05] Sekarreporter 1: [11/17, 15:25] Sekarreporter 1: ஜெ. மரணம் சிபிஐ விசாரணை கோரி ஆர.ஆர் கோபால் ஜி வழக்கு சிபிஐக்கு அரசுக்கு மனு கொடுத்துவிட்டு வரவும் என்று Mhc acj...

R.O.C.NQ.158/2022-J  CI  RCU LA R                   There                   will                    be                     a                   Full                  Court              Reference                    by   the  Hon’ble Acting Chief Justice in the Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building,  High Court, Madras at 3.30 p.m.,  on Monday, the 21 0t November 2022, touching the demise of (Late) Thiru. K. Alagiriswami and (Late) Thiru. R.Krishnamoorthy, Senior Advocates.

R.O.C.NQ.158/2022-J CI  RCU LA R                  There                   will                    be                     a                   Full                  Court              Reference                    by   the Hon’ble Acting Chief Justice in the Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras at 3.30 p.m.,  on Monday, the 21 0t November 2022, touching the demise of (Late) Thiru. K. Alagiriswami and (Late) Thiru. R.Krishnamoorthy, Senior Advocates.

R.O.C.NQ.158/2022-J CI  RCU LA R There                   will                    be                     a                   Full                  Court              Reference                    by   the Hon’ble Acting Chief Justice in the Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras at 3.30 p.m.,  on...

Supreme Court stays death sentence of man convicted for rape, murder of 3-year-old; allows psychological examination The Court also allowed a representative of anti-death penalty body, Project 39A of National Law University, Delhi to visit the convict to conduct a psychological assessment relevant to his sentencing. The Supreme Court recently stayed the execution of a man on death row who had been convicted for rape and murder a three-year-old girl [Ramkirat Munilal Goud vs Maharashtra

Supreme Court stays death sentence of man convicted for rape, murder of 3-year-old; allows psychological examination The Court also allowed a representative of anti-death penalty body, Project 39A of National Law University, Delhi to visit the convict to conduct a psychological assessment relevant to his sentencing. The Supreme Court recently stayed the execution of a man on death row who had been convicted for rape and murder a three-year-old girl [Ramkirat Munilal Goud vs Maharashtra

Supreme Court stays death sentence of man convicted for rape, murder of 3-year-old; allows psychological examination The Court also allowed a representative of anti-death penalty body, Project 39A of National Law University, Delhi to...

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY  A.S.No.4 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.158 of 2016  S.K.Muthugavi   .. Appellant.  For Appellant                              : Mr.M.R.Thangavel    for Mr.S.Sathyaraj                                   For Respondents       : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu, for R1  : Mr.T.Chandrasekaran,    Spl. Government Pleader for R2  JUDGMENT  The Appeal Suit :

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.4 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.158 of 2016 S.K.Muthugavi   .. Appellant. For Appellant                              : Mr.M.R.Thangavel   for Mr.S.Sathyaraj                                  For Respondents       : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu, for R1 : Mr.T.Chandrasekaran,   Spl. Government Pleader for R2 JUDGMENT The Appeal Suit :

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment Reserved on : 09.11.2022 Judgment Pronounced on : 15.11.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.4 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.158 of 2016 S.K.Muthugavi   .....

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY  Appeal Suit Nos.79 & 80 of 2006  Appeal Suit No.79 of 2006:    For Appellants          :  Mr.K.V.Sundararajan  For RR 2 to 6 in :  Mr.G.Masilamamani, Senior Counsel A.S.No.79/2006 &    Assisted by Mr.V.Sanjeevi For R-1 in A.S.  No.80/2006  * R1 died in A.S.No.79 of 2006 & R2 Notice Served in A.S.No.80 of 2006

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Appeal Suit Nos.79 & 80 of 2006 Appeal Suit No.79 of 2006: For Appellants          :  Mr.K.V.Sundararajan For RR 2 to 6 in :  Mr.G.Masilamamani, Senior Counsel A.S.No.79/2006 &    Assisted by Mr.V.Sanjeevi For R-1 in A.S. No.80/2006 * R1 died in A.S.No.79 of 2006 & R2 Notice Served in A.S.No.80 of 2006

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON          :      31.10.2022 PRONOUNCED ON   :      15.11.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Appeal Suit Nos.79 & 80 of 2006 Appeal Suit...

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN  Crl.OP.No.18504 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.9732 of 2018 and Crl.O.P.No.18650 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.9830 of 2018  M.Kavitha  Additional Commissioner  (Tiruppani), HR&CE Department.  For Petitioner           : Mr.A.Ramesh, Senior Counsel    For Mr.G.R.Hari in both cases                           For R1                                : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar       Government Advocate (Crl. Side) in both cases.                           For R2    : Mr.K.P.P.Raja Raja    F.I.R. on the file of the first respondent Sivakanchi police station, Kancheepuram in Crime No. 341 of 2018 also stands quashed.

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Crl.OP.No.18504 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.9732 of 2018 and Crl.O.P.No.18650 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.9830 of 2018 M.Kavitha Additional Commissioner (Tiruppani), HR&CE Department. For Petitioner           : Mr.A.Ramesh, Senior Counsel   For Mr.G.R.Hari in both cases                          For R1                                : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar      Government Advocate (Crl. Side) in both cases.                          For R2    : Mr.K.P.P.Raja Raja F.I.R. on the file of the first respondent Sivakanchi police station, Kancheepuram in Crime No. 341 of 2018 also stands quashed.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on 23.08.2022 Pronounced on 15.11.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Crl.OP.No.18504 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.9732 of 2018 and Crl.O.P.No.18650 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.9830...

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR  W.P.No.27151 of 2022  and W.M.P.Nos.26366, 26368 and 26370 of 2022 Greeshma Gopal.   For Petitioners         : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan     Senior counsel     for Mr.Abishek Jenasenan  For Respondents  : Ms.M.Sneha, Standing counsel for R1     Mr.A.Sundaravadhanan for R4 and R10     Dr.R.Gowri for R12     Mr.A.S.Balaji for R14     Ms.S.Akila for R5, R6, R11, R21 and R25     Mr.G.Sankaran for R26 and R27     Mr.J.Kather Hussain for R28     Mr.M.Vijaya Mehanath for R36    Mr.T.R.Rajagopalan, Senior counsel    for Mr.C.V.Vijayakumar for R35  ORDER      In this regard, an annexure can be issued containing what are all the documents to be annexed along with the application even at the time of making online application, so that every candidate can scan the documents and upload the same along with the online application so that this kind of quarrels can be avoided in the future years. Also there shall be direction to the first respondent that, from the next Academic Year, whoever makes application under NRI quota, at the time of scrutiny of the application, the first respondent shall take effort to get verification from the Indian Embassy concerned, who gave such certificates, as to the genuinity of those certificates and after getting the communication from the Embassy concerned, if any ingenuine certificates are found, the candidature of those applicants who filed the ingenuine NRI certificates can be rejected.

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.No.27151 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.26366, 26368 and 26370 of 2022 Greeshma Gopal. For Petitioners         : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan     Senior counsel     for Mr.Abishek Jenasenan For Respondents  : Ms.M.Sneha, Standing counsel for R1    Mr.A.Sundaravadhanan for R4 and R10    Dr.R.Gowri for R12    Mr.A.S.Balaji for R14    Ms.S.Akila for R5, R6, R11, R21 and R25    Mr.G.Sankaran for R26 and R27    Mr.J.Kather Hussain for R28    Mr.M.Vijaya Mehanath for R36    Mr.T.R.Rajagopalan, Senior counsel    for Mr.C.V.Vijayakumar for R35 ORDER In this regard, an annexure can be issued containing what are all the documents to be annexed along with the application even at the time of making online application, so that every candidate can scan the documents and upload the same along with the online application so that this kind of quarrels can be avoided in the future years. Also there shall be direction to the first respondent that, from the next Academic Year, whoever makes application under NRI quota, at the time of scrutiny of the application, the first respondent shall take effort to get verification from the Indian Embassy concerned, who gave such certificates, as to the genuinity of those certificates and after getting the communication from the Embassy concerned, if any ingenuine certificates are found, the candidature of those applicants who filed the ingenuine NRI certificates can be rejected.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Date : 14.11.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.No.27151 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.26366, 26368 and 26370 of 2022 Greeshma Gopal Rohan Mahesh Avinash Jothish...

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM     W.P.No.34112 of 2016  and  W.M.P.Nos.29439, 29440 & 38455 of 2016  and 21083 & 37918 of 2017     S.Muthumalai Rani       …  Petitioner.     For Petitioner               : Mr.B.Kumar                           Senior Counsel              The activities of the “Flying Squads” are directed to be monitored by the Head of the Department / Government as the case may be, so as to maintain the efficiency of the “Flying Squads”. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands allowed, with the above directions. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. However, there shall be no orders as to costs.                                                 For Mr.T.Sudhan Raj                         For R1, R4 to R6                    : Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu                                                                Additional Government Pleader                                           For R2                         : Mr.D.Gopal                                                                Government Advocate                         For R3                         : Mr.V.Murali O R D E R

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.34112 of 2016 and W.M.P.Nos.29439, 29440 & 38455 of 2016 and 21083 & 37918 of 2017   S.Muthumalai Rani       …  Petitioner. For Petitioner               : Mr.B.Kumar                          Senior Counsel             The activities of the “Flying Squads” are directed to be monitored by the Head of the Department / Government as the case may be, so as to maintain the efficiency of the “Flying Squads”. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands allowed, with the above directions. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. However, there shall be no orders as to costs.                                                 For Mr.T.Sudhan Raj                     For R1, R4 to R6                    : Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu                                                               Additional Government Pleader                                         For R2                         : Mr.D.Gopal                                                               Government Advocate                     For R3                         : Mr.V.Murali O R D E R

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   DATED  : 16.11.2022   CORAM   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.34112 of 2016 and W.M.P.Nos.29439, 29440 & 38455 of 2016 and 21083 & 37918...

Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/nJlP8FqFvdI [11/16, 12:24] Sekarreporter 1: [11/16, 11:42] Sekarreporter 1: [11/16, 11:38] Sekarreporter 1: Gambling case withdrawn [11/16, 11:40] Sekarreporter 1: ஆன்லைன் கேம்லிங் வழக்கு வாபஸ்      Acting Chief Justice wonders how can court pass interim order when no cause of action had arisen due to the Ordinance not having come into force because the Govt is yet to notify it. In the meantime a Bill has also been passed and the Governor is yet to give assent to it.

Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/nJlP8FqFvdI [11/16, 12:24] Sekarreporter 1: [11/16, 11:42] Sekarreporter 1: [11/16, 11:38] Sekarreporter 1: Gambling case withdrawn [11/16, 11:40] Sekarreporter 1: ஆன்லைன் கேம்லிங் வழக்கு வாபஸ் Acting Chief Justice wonders how can court pass interim order when no cause of action had arisen due to the Ordinance not having come into force because the Govt is yet to notify it. In the meantime a Bill has also been passed and the Governor is yet to give assent to it.

[11/16, 11:34] Sekarreporter 1: Madras HC Acting Chief Justice T Raja & Justice D Krishnakumar  a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Online Gambling and Regulation of Online...