SEKAR REPORTER Blog

“The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the borrower seeking the income tax returns ( ITR ) of the lender. The high court advised the petitioner to approach Reserve Bank of India ( RBI ) to resolve the grievance or complaint with regard to the manner in which financing business was carried…”https://www.taxscan.in/madras-hc-dismisses-borrowers-petition-for-lenders-income-tax-returns-advises-resorting-to-rbi-for-resolution-on-financing-business-concerns/386372/#:~:text=The%20Madras%20High,business%20was%20carried%E2%80%A6

“The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the borrower seeking the income tax returns ( ITR ) of the lender. The high court advised the petitioner to approach Reserve Bank of India ( RBI ) to resolve the grievance or complaint with regard to the manner in which financing business was carried…”https://www.taxscan.in/madras-hc-dismisses-borrowers-petition-for-lenders-income-tax-returns-advises-resorting-to-rbi-for-resolution-on-financing-business-concerns/386372/#:~:text=The%20Madras%20High,business%20was%20carried%E2%80%A6

[25/03, 16:30] sekarreporter1: “The Madras High Court has disposed of the writ petition filed by the famous Ramco Cements challenging the constitutionality of the Sections 115 WA to 115 WL of Income Tax Act, 1961 on the grounds that the said provisions have been removed from the statute. The petitioner Ramco Cements seeks the issuance of a sekarreporter1: 👍

[25/03, 16:30] sekarreporter1: “The Madras High Court has disposed of the writ petition filed by the famous Ramco Cements challenging the constitutionality of the Sections 115 WA to 115 WL of Income Tax Act, 1961 on the grounds that the said provisions have been removed from the statute. The petitioner Ramco Cements seeks the issuance of a sekarreporter1: 👍

[25/03, 16:30] sekarreporter1: “The Madras High Court has disposed of the writ petition filed by the famous Ramco Cements challenging the constitutionality of the Sections 115 WA to 115 WL of Income Tax Act,...

There is no cross empowerment under GST Act in the absence of Any Notification issued to that effect under Section 6 of the GST Act.

There is no cross empowerment under GST Act in the absence of Any Notification issued to that effect under Section 6 of the GST Act.

[25/03, 16:12] sekarreporter1: There is no cross empowerment under GST Act in the absence of Any Notification issued to that effect under Section 6 of the GST Act.[25/03, 16:13] sekarreporter1: [25/03, 15:57] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1772208600943087742?t=6Y5ZiETpMNU5jcCQLSD6LA&s=08[25/03,...

https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1772208600943087742?t=6Y5ZiETpMNU5jcCQLSD6LA&s=08[25/03, 15:57] sekarreporter1: Case SummaryHere is the analysis of the judgment using the provided framework:Issues:The Appellant is Tvl.Vardhan Infraastructre and the Respondents are various tax authorities like the Special Secretary of GST Council, Chairman of CBIC, Commissioner of State Taxes, etc.

https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1772208600943087742?t=6Y5ZiETpMNU5jcCQLSD6LA&s=08[25/03, 15:57] sekarreporter1: Case SummaryHere is the analysis of the judgment using the provided framework:Issues:The Appellant is Tvl.Vardhan Infraastructre and the Respondents are various tax authorities like the Special Secretary of GST Council, Chairman of CBIC, Commissioner of State Taxes, etc.

[25/03, 15:57] The Court quashed the impugned proceedings but directed the Central Authority/State Authority, to whom the respective petitioners were assigned, to initiate appropriate proceedings afresh against them in accordance with the provisions of...

Gst case full order THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANANW. P.Nos.34792, 29878, 30607, 30613, 30615 of 2019 & W.P.Nos.3011,3013, 3026, 3028, 4922, 8495, 8496, 11319 of 2020 & W.P.Nos. 2723,

Gst case full order THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANANW. P.Nos.34792, 29878, 30607, 30613, 30615 of 2019 & W.P.Nos.3011,3013, 3026, 3028, 4922, 8495, 8496, 11319 of 2020 & W.P.Nos. 2723,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved On 15.09.2023Pronounced On . .2024CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANANW. P.Nos.34792, 29878, 30607, 30613, 30615 of 2019 & W.P.Nos.3011,3013, 3026, 3028, 4922, 8495, 8496, 11319 of 2020...

division bench comprising Justice R Subramanian ans Justice R Senthilkumar heard the appeal preferred by OPS challenging the single judge order.

division bench comprising Justice R Subramanian ans Justice R Senthilkumar heard the appeal preferred by OPS challenging the single judge order.

[25/03, 14:47] sekarreporter1: + Home NewsTamil Nadu MHC refuses to stay single judge order restraining OPS claiming as coordinator A division bench comprising Justice R Subrama https://www.dtnext.in/news/tamilnadu/mhc-refuses-to-stay-single-judge-order-restraining-ops-claiming-as-coordinator-776122[25/03, 14:48] sekarreporter1: division bench comprising Justice R...

PT Asha judge directed to recount the 605 postal ballot which was rejected by the returning officer in the Krishnagiri constituency during the 2021 assembly election and file a report before the court.

PT Asha judge directed to recount the 605 postal ballot which was rejected by the returning officer in the Krishnagiri constituency during the 2021 assembly election and file a report before the court.

+chat epaperdtnextHome NewsTamil NaduMHC directs to recount the rejected postal ballots in 2021 Krishnagiri electionJustice PT Asha pronounced the final order in a election petition filed by DMK candidate T Senguttuvan challenging the election...

The DMK candidate Mr. T. Senguttuvan had challenged the election of a AIADMK candidate K. Ashok Kumar in the 2021 Assembly elections to the Krishnagiri Assembly constituency before the Madras High Court.

The DMK candidate Mr. T. Senguttuvan had challenged the election of a AIADMK candidate K. Ashok Kumar in the 2021 Assembly elections to the Krishnagiri Assembly constituency before the Madras High Court.

[25/03, 11:23] sekarreporter1: [25/03, 11:22] sekarreporter1: The DMK candidate Mr. T. Senguttuvan had challenged the election of a AIADMK candidate K. Ashok Kumar in the 2021 Assembly elections to the Krishnagiri Assembly constituency before...

Ex-CM @OfficeOfOPS gets not relief from #madrashighcourt as division bench of R Subramanian and R Sakthivel refuses to pass any interim order against single judge’s order barring OPS from using @AIADMKOfficial flay, symbol&letter, apart from claiming the coordinator @xpresstn

Ex-CM @OfficeOfOPS gets not relief from #madrashighcourt as division bench of R Subramanian and R Sakthivel refuses to pass any interim order against single judge’s order barring OPS from using @AIADMKOfficial flay, symbol&letter, apart from claiming the coordinator @xpresstn

Ex-CM @OfficeOfOPS gets not relief from #madrashighcourt as division bench of R Subramanian and R Sakthivel refuses to pass any interim order against single judge’s order barring OPS from using @AIADMKOfficial flay, symbol&letter, apart...