Follow:
- Next story [7/19, 11:02] Sekarreporter: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1416994176718106625?s=08 [7/19, 11:02] Sekarreporter: NGT asks Chennai Metro Rail Ltd to not proceed with its project along the Nanmangalam Reserve Forest area without getting necessary permissions and approvals required under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. @THChennai https://t.co/BIkiByf1t4
- Previous story 21:06] Ayyar And Dolia: CMRL 2nd phase expansion through Nangmangallam forest is given a nod by NGT Chennai bench with approval from Forest Department. CMRL has conducted Biodiversity and environmental impact assessment reports. The proposed stretch of CMRL Corridor 5 alignment
Recent Posts
- today 9 law tips Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed Ahmed vs koppa & another : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge made or entered in writing , it should necessarily contain reasons ( Rule 12 ( 4) debt recovery tribunal ( procedure ) rules 1993
- வாக்காளர்களுக்கு எந்த வகையில் லஞ்சம் கொடுத்தாலும், அது அரசியலமைப்பு, ஜனநாயகத்தின் கட்டமைப்பை தகர்த்துவிடும் என உயர் நீதிமன்ற மதுரைக் கிளை judge pugalenthi எச்சரிக்கை/ mukesh reporter
- The Madras High Court recently held that consuming alcohol during day is not an offence and a person involved in a motor accident cannot be held guilty without assessing the percentage of alcohol in his or her blood.
- [17/04, 20:23] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/Q9RV-cOqjYI?si=La0UgPv1LzkfvrLx[17/04, 20:23] sekarreporter1: judge Baratha chakravarthy excellant/Lecture /mediation#in mba chennai/question and judhe answer
- Chief justice bench dismissed batch of cases /For Petitioners : Mr.A.L.Somayaji, Senior Counsel for Mr.Anand Gopalan, T.S.Gopalan & Co.For Respondent No.1 : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, Additional Solicitor-Generalassisted by Mr.Rajesh Vivekanandan, Deputy Solicitor-GeneralFor Respondents 2, 3 : Mr.G.Ilangovan, SPCFor Respondents 4-6,8 : Ms.E.Maragatha SundariFor Respondent No.7 : No appearanceCOMMON ORDER D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.All these writ petitions have been filed challenging the constitutional validity of the Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act (Act 6/2016).
More
Recent Posts
- today 9 law tips Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed Ahmed vs koppa & another : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge made or entered in writing , it should necessarily contain reasons ( Rule 12 ( 4) debt recovery tribunal ( procedure ) rules 1993
- வாக்காளர்களுக்கு எந்த வகையில் லஞ்சம் கொடுத்தாலும், அது அரசியலமைப்பு, ஜனநாயகத்தின் கட்டமைப்பை தகர்த்துவிடும் என உயர் நீதிமன்ற மதுரைக் கிளை judge pugalenthi எச்சரிக்கை/ mukesh reporter
- The Madras High Court recently held that consuming alcohol during day is not an offence and a person involved in a motor accident cannot be held guilty without assessing the percentage of alcohol in his or her blood.
- [17/04, 20:23] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/Q9RV-cOqjYI?si=La0UgPv1LzkfvrLx[17/04, 20:23] sekarreporter1: judge Baratha chakravarthy excellant/Lecture /mediation#in mba chennai/question and judhe answer
- Chief justice bench dismissed batch of cases /For Petitioners : Mr.A.L.Somayaji, Senior Counsel for Mr.Anand Gopalan, T.S.Gopalan & Co.For Respondent No.1 : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, Additional Solicitor-Generalassisted by Mr.Rajesh Vivekanandan, Deputy Solicitor-GeneralFor Respondents 2, 3 : Mr.G.Ilangovan, SPCFor Respondents 4-6,8 : Ms.E.Maragatha SundariFor Respondent No.7 : No appearanceCOMMON ORDER D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.All these writ petitions have been filed challenging the constitutional validity of the Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act (Act 6/2016).