Mr. Sanjay R Hegde, is a Senior Advocate zoom meeting today 11 o clock by Sekar Reporter · April 22, 2020 286SHARESShareTweetDaily Newsletter!Mr. Sanjay R Hegde, is a Senior Advocate at the Supreme Court of India. He began his illustrious career back in 1989 while working as a lawyer with M/s Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe Solicitors. He gained his LL.M while at work and thereafter moved to Delhi to practice in the Supreme Court in the Chambers of Senior Advocate Mr. G. Ramaswamy. During this period he worked on several high profile cases, appeared for the Government of Indian before an international arbitral tribunal and from 1996 to 2004 was on the Union of India’s arguing panel before the Supreme Court. He also worked for a decade as the Advocate on Record for the State of Karnataka and thereafter focused on private practice. He has frequently engaged in legal journalism including appearing on television panels and writing as a columnist for newspapers.In this interview, he talks to us about:His career choices and the reasoning behind them.His experiences in the various roles and offices he has assumed over the years.His opinions on miscellaneous topics – the importance of mooting and writing for students, ADR in International Law and legal journalism.His advice to law students while studying, practicing and moulding their careers.
[6/9, 12:06] Sekarreporter 1: A PIL has been filed in Madras HC against conduct of online classes by schools. Litigant says children are being exposed to porn sites. @THChennai https://t.co/eRt1Eo0u June 9, 2020 by Sekar Reporter · Published June 9, 2020
Full.list MADRAS HIGH COURT SITTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR CHRISTMAS HOLIDAYS – 2023 PRINCIPAL SEAT AT MADRAS AND MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT AT MADURAI It is hereby notified that the following sitting arrangements are made for Christmas Holidays December 24, 2023 by Sekar Reporter · Published December 24, 2023
Justice P.N. Prakash observed so while dismissing a petition filed by a person to quash a criminal case booked against him for having allegedly made two women impersonate his sisters to sell one of the many immovable properties inherited by the siblings after their parents’ death. —Offences cannot be compounded based on ‘unholy’ compromises: HC January 16, 2021 by Sekar Reporter · Published January 16, 2021