You may also like...
-
adv manuj / udyanithy
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 5, 2023
-
17.When it is clearly established that petitioner had no role in the bank operations and statutory transaction of the first accused company and when there is no specific averment in the complaint that petitioner was in charge of and responsible to the company for the conduct of the business of the company and when that the impugned cheques were not signed by him and he is neither the Managing Director nor the Joint Director, this Court is of the considered view that there is absolutely no ground to prosecute petitioner for the offence under Section 138 NI Act. 18.In this view of the matter, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner in C.C.No.787/2019, pending on the file of Fast Track III, Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai–600015 is quashed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 29.03.2023 sli Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order To: 1.The Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Fast Track III, Saidapet, Chennai – 600015. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J. sli Pre-delivery Order in Crl.O.P.No.7559 of 2022 29.03.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 6, 2023
-
Plea to remove Governor not maintainable, says High Court
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 4, 2020