![Justice G. Jayachandran added that though the courts should generally ‘lean upon legitimacy and frown upon bastardy’ [as laid down in Badri Prasad v. Dy. Director of Consolidation and others] it can also not consider a deceased person as responsible for the birth of the minor appellant. Attempts made to obtain the property of a deceased person by claiming parentage must be equally frowned upon, the court remarked.](http://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story S. PRABAKARAN, Senior Advocate along with R. BALASUBRAMANIAN Senior Advocate appeared today in the famous case of M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India & Ors before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, where the Hon’ble Supreme Court banned Sale and Registration of BS-IV Vehicle after 31st March, 2020. S. PRABAKARAN, Senior Advocate appeared for the car owner who had purchased a Skoda Rapid motor car (Petrol Variant – BS IV) from Gurudev Motors Private Limited, Anna Salai, Chennai, within the time period stipulated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in its earlier judgment dated 24.10.2018.
- Previous story The Madras High Court on Thursday directed the State government to reply by Friday as to whether it would be possible to exempt from lockdown, the garment manufacturers and exporters having their units in Chennai, Tiruvallur, Kancheepuram and Chengalpattu districts. Justice R. Subramanian posed the question on a writ petition filed by Apparels and Handloom Exporters Association representing over 400 major garment manufacturers and exporters who employ over 1.5 lakh people directly in their units spread in and around Chennai.
Recent Posts
- Justice AD Jagadish Chandira adjourned for a week the bail petitions filed by eight persons. During the hearing, Kruthika reportedly stood by the statement she made in her two videos, which she had released after her alleged abduction, that she had left Tenkasi of her own free will and had been already married to Maitrik last year.
- Judge ananth venkadesh கிராமப்புற பகுதிகளில் உள்ள ஏழை மக்களும் சிறப்பு நிபுணத்துவ சிகிச்சை பெற வேண்டுமென குறிப்பிட்டுள்ள நீதிபதி, மருத்துவர்களை நோயாளிகள் கடவுளுக்கு நிகராக மதிக்கக் கூடிய சூழலில், அந்த கடவுள்கள் தங்கள் நேரத்தை வழக்குகளில் செலவழிக்க வேண்டாம் என நீதிபதி கேட்டுக் கொண்டுள்ளார்.
- MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.R.P.Nos.206 and 208 of 2023 and The Sub Court, Pollachi is directed to proceed with the case without causing any undue delay and dispose of the matrimonial proceedings as expeditiously as possible.
- . CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.377 of 2015 1.L.Nagarajan In the result, the A.S.No.337 of 2015 is partly allowed (i) The judgment and decree of the II Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, in O.S.No.8415 of 2010 is modified as follows: (a) The suit is partly decreed directing the first defendant to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.16,60,868/- with future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the plaint till the date of realization;
- THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.4 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 Jagadeesan … Appellant In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Kattukandi Edathil Krishnan Vs. Kattukani Edathil Valsan5, the next date of hearing is fixed before the Trial Court on 23.12.2022 and the parties shall appear before the Trial Court without any further notice on the said date. If any application for the final decree is pending, the same shall be continued. Even in the absence of any final decree application, the Trial Court shall proceed with the final decree proceedings.
More
Recent Posts
- Justice AD Jagadish Chandira adjourned for a week the bail petitions filed by eight persons. During the hearing, Kruthika reportedly stood by the statement she made in her two videos, which she had released after her alleged abduction, that she had left Tenkasi of her own free will and had been already married to Maitrik last year.
- Judge ananth venkadesh கிராமப்புற பகுதிகளில் உள்ள ஏழை மக்களும் சிறப்பு நிபுணத்துவ சிகிச்சை பெற வேண்டுமென குறிப்பிட்டுள்ள நீதிபதி, மருத்துவர்களை நோயாளிகள் கடவுளுக்கு நிகராக மதிக்கக் கூடிய சூழலில், அந்த கடவுள்கள் தங்கள் நேரத்தை வழக்குகளில் செலவழிக்க வேண்டாம் என நீதிபதி கேட்டுக் கொண்டுள்ளார்.
- MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.R.P.Nos.206 and 208 of 2023 and The Sub Court, Pollachi is directed to proceed with the case without causing any undue delay and dispose of the matrimonial proceedings as expeditiously as possible.
- . CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.377 of 2015 1.L.Nagarajan In the result, the A.S.No.337 of 2015 is partly allowed (i) The judgment and decree of the II Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, in O.S.No.8415 of 2010 is modified as follows: (a) The suit is partly decreed directing the first defendant to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.16,60,868/- with future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the plaint till the date of realization;
- THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.4 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 Jagadeesan … Appellant In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Kattukandi Edathil Krishnan Vs. Kattukani Edathil Valsan5, the next date of hearing is fixed before the Trial Court on 23.12.2022 and the parties shall appear before the Trial Court without any further notice on the said date. If any application for the final decree is pending, the same shall be continued. Even in the absence of any final decree application, the Trial Court shall proceed with the final decree proceedings.
